5.2 sec in total
260 ms
4.1 sec
842 ms
Visit tum-boring.com now to see the best up-to-date TUM Boring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tum-boring.com
TUM Boring – Innovation in Tunneling is a team of the TU Munich participating in the Not-a-Boring Competition by Elon Musk's Boring Company
Visit tum-boring.comWe analyzed Tum-boring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tum-boring.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value2,830 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
260 ms
1142 ms
49 ms
266 ms
326 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Tum-boring.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tum-boring.com.
Page size can be reduced by 223.9 kB (5%)
4.3 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Tum-boring.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TUM Boring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tum-boring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (60%)
72
29
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TUM Boring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tum-boring.com
260 ms
tum-boring.com
1142 ms
js
49 ms
dashicons.min.css
266 ms
common-style.css
326 ms
slick.min.css
327 ms
font-awesome.min.css
343 ms
style-blocks-htmega.css
334 ms
htbbootstrap.css
350 ms
font-awesome.min.css
390 ms
animation.css
434 ms
htmega-keyframes.css
485 ms
boring.css
554 ms
all.css
148 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
490 ms
swiper.min.css
473 ms
post-1585.css
489 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
560 ms
global.css
614 ms
post-5.css
594 ms
css
23 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
602 ms
jquery.min.js
689 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
668 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
563 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
705 ms
animations.min.css
706 ms
slick.min.js
730 ms
script.js
730 ms
popper.min.js
731 ms
htbbootstrap.js
749 ms
waypoints.js
749 ms
script.js
762 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
790 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
790 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
817 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
871 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
839 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
871 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
987 ms
hooks.min.js
915 ms
i18n.min.js
770 ms
frontend.min.js
736 ms
waypoints.min.js
752 ms
core.min.js
758 ms
frontend.min.js
808 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
799 ms
20210912_115021-scaled.jpg
2049 ms
IMG_20210711_154230-scaled.jpg
994 ms
tum-mgm-scaled.jpg
1820 ms
nabc-2-1024x98.png
591 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image-18-1-1024x768.jpg
979 ms
20210912_174322-1024x768.jpg
941 ms
Retractable-Roll-Up-Banner-v2_page-0001-scaled-e1680300326611-532x1024.jpg
898 ms
hofmann-face-300x300.jpg
1022 ms
DSC04011-scaled.jpg
1900 ms
faz.png
1006 ms
Sueddeutsche.png
1017 ms
Handelsblatt.png
1045 ms
business-insider.png
1118 ms
Muenchner-Merkur.png
1129 ms
welt.png
1200 ms
IK_Bau.png
1227 ms
Gravity-Regular.otf
1244 ms
Gravity-Bold.otf
1341 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
79 ms
t3n.png
1353 ms
gruenderszene.jpg
1325 ms
Abendzeitung.png
1418 ms
munich-startup-1.png
1391 ms
golem.png
1404 ms
1e9.png
1491 ms
512px-DER_STANDARD.svg_.png
1448 ms
logo-produktion.png
1439 ms
dmt_puls.jpg
1510 ms
logo_full_white.svg
1186 ms
logo_full_black.svg
1176 ms
tum-boring.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tum-boring.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tum-boring.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tum-boring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tum-boring.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
tum-boring.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TUM Boring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: