5.4 sec in total
457 ms
4.7 sec
250 ms
Visit tuningsvs.ru now to see the best up-to-date Tunings VS content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tuningsvs.ru
Visit tuningsvs.ruWe analyzed Tuningsvs.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 457 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tuningsvs.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.518
15/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
457 ms
1753 ms
44 ms
67 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Tuningsvs.ru, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Code.jivosite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Tuningsvs.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 167.9 kB (26%)
635.8 kB
468.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuningsvs.ru main page is 635.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 451.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.2 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 686 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tunings VS needs image optimization as it can save up to 686 B or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (43%)
72
41
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tunings VS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tuningsvs.ru
457 ms
www.tuningsvs.ru
1753 ms
css
44 ms
icon
67 ms
bootstrap.min.css
196 ms
vsbootstrap.css
287 ms
user.css
289 ms
desktop.css
291 ms
desktop.css
307 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
291 ms
jquery.cookie.js
307 ms
user.js
381 ms
vsbootstrap.shop.css
382 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
383 ms
user.css
388 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
390 ms
main.js
390 ms
main.css
476 ms
bootstrap.min.js
463 ms
jquery.maskedinput-1.3.min.js
463 ms
jquery.sticky.js
464 ms
default.js
464 ms
lazy.js
465 ms
lazy.load.js
486 ms
default.shop.js
486 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
489 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
489 ms
jquery.retina.min.js
489 ms
tag.js
834 ms
3_0_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
585 ms
header_back.jpg
100 ms
gridtile.png
173 ms
header-bl-left.png
173 ms
vsavto_logo.png
284 ms
drive2_logo.png
285 ms
vk_reviews_logo.png
285 ms
instagram_banner.jpg
199 ms
506.1080x0.png
555 ms
77447.0x260.JPG
268 ms
75188.0x260.JPG
296 ms
72336.0x260.JPG
414 ms
73034.0x260.JPG
416 ms
75943.0x260.JPG
415 ms
73577.0x260.JPG
416 ms
91215.0x260.jpg
417 ms
74314.0x260.JPG
460 ms
74978.0x260.JPG
476 ms
73967.0x260.JPG
477 ms
73877.0x260.JPG
478 ms
75850.0x260.jpg
489 ms
62021.0x260.jpg
578 ms
73368.0x260.JPG
579 ms
77835.0x260.JPG
579 ms
74131.0x260.JPG
580 ms
73639.0x260.JPG
587 ms
71134.0x260.jpg
593 ms
75696.0x260.jpg
593 ms
76338.0x260.JPG
607 ms
73331.0x260.JPG
609 ms
72716.0x260.JPG
610 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf
36 ms
map-sm.png
756 ms
map.png
723 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxP.ttf
24 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc9.ttf
25 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9.ttf
24 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9.ttf
26 ms
openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js
242 ms
footGrLine.png
464 ms
social.png
517 ms
watch.js
0 ms
wnzdyMb8K3
228 ms
font-awesome.min.css
407 ms
fontface.css
407 ms
bx_loader.gif
428 ms
wnzdyMb8K3
324 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
197 ms
advert.gif
632 ms
wnzdyMb8K3
512 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
138 ms
bundle_ru_RU.js
48 ms
tuningsvs.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
tuningsvs.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tuningsvs.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuningsvs.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Tuningsvs.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuningsvs.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tunings VS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: