8.2 sec in total
645 ms
7 sec
521 ms
Click here to check amazing Tunix content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tunix.co.in
Asia’s Top Climatic I Environmental Test Chambers & Calibration Equipment Manufacturer for Precise Results for Critical product Testing & Calibration
Visit tunix.co.inWe analyzed Tunix.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 645 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
tunix.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.0 s
0/100
10%
Value23.7 s
0/100
25%
Value19.0 s
0/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.294
41/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
645 ms
2920 ms
1057 ms
636 ms
1274 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Tunix.co.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tunix.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (45%)
3.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Tunix.co.in main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 227.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 227.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tunix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 886.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tunix.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 886.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (54%)
72
33
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tunix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tunix.co.in
645 ms
tunix.co.in
2920 ms
frontend.css
1057 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
636 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1274 ms
swiper.min.css
860 ms
post-6.css
650 ms
global.css
859 ms
post-7.css
1059 ms
post-77.css
866 ms
post-102.css
1067 ms
style.css
1074 ms
style.min.css
1083 ms
theme.min.css
1265 ms
header-footer.min.css
1271 ms
ekiticons.css
1683 ms
widget-styles.css
2154 ms
responsive.css
1299 ms
css
68 ms
jquery.min.js
1690 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1481 ms
slick.css
56 ms
w3.css
65 ms
slick.min.js
62 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
57 ms
js
111 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1270 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1084 ms
post-1396.css
1261 ms
custom.js
1262 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1299 ms
frontend-script.js
1457 ms
widget-scripts.js
1675 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
1472 ms
frontend.js
1474 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1519 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1961 ms
waypoints.min.js
1682 ms
core.min.js
1686 ms
frontend.min.js
1956 ms
animate-circle.min.js
1960 ms
elementor.js
1961 ms
gtm.js
181 ms
tunix-logo-new-300x166.png
333 ms
F1-1.jpg
335 ms
Final-Banner01-1.jpg
465 ms
feature_img.png
634 ms
Industrial-oven.png
335 ms
Featured-Image-3-1-219x300.jpg
335 ms
Featured-Image-219x300.png
475 ms
Featured-Image-2-219x300.jpg
475 ms
Featured-Image-3-219x300.jpg
466 ms
Untitled-design-219x300.png
474 ms
Featured-Image-219x300.jpg
678 ms
Featured-Image-1-1-219x300.jpg
679 ms
Featured-Image-1-219x300.jpg
681 ms
Featured-Image-2-1-219x300.jpg
685 ms
Untitled-design-22-235x300.png
687 ms
Featured-Image-3-219x300.jpg
839 ms
Featured-Image-1-219x300.jpg
890 ms
Featured-Image-219x300.jpg
888 ms
Featured-Image-2-219x300.jpg
891 ms
ED-90-X-2-300x300.webp
899 ms
Featured-Image-219x300.jpg
904 ms
Featured-Image-1-1-219x300.jpg
1048 ms
Featured-Image-3-219x300.jpg
1098 ms
Featured-Image-2-219x300.jpg
1100 ms
Featured-Image-1-219x300.jpg
1101 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2024-04-12-at-16.19.33.jpeg
1115 ms
Footer-Image.jpg
1570 ms
icons8-phone-50.png
1248 ms
wp-icon-final.png
1310 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-2fRkBI95WamXgElL.woff
48 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RkBI95WamXgElL.woff
47 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-NfNkBI95WamXgElL.woff
213 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-DPNkBI95WamXgElL.woff
219 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-a_NkBI95WamXgElL.woff
219 ms
elementskit.woff
1417 ms
prev-icon-wh.png
998 ms
next-icon-wh.png
1003 ms
tunix.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tunix.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tunix.co.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tunix.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tunix.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tunix.co.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tunix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: