6.9 sec in total
2.6 sec
4 sec
258 ms
Welcome to turk.travel homepage info - get ready to check Turk best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about turk.travel
Turktravel Urlaub unter Freunden
Visit turk.travelWe analyzed Turk.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Turk.travel rating and web reputation
turk.travel performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
2573 ms
254 ms
522 ms
789 ms
661 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Turk.travel, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Turk.travel.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (67%)
1.5 MB
491.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Turk.travel main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 928.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Turk needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 760.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 760.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Turk.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (56%)
70
31
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Turk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
turk.travel
2573 ms
reset.css
254 ms
masterpage.css
522 ms
main.css
789 ms
ui.css
661 ms
menu.css
400 ms
dropdown.css
377 ms
grid.css
502 ms
autosuggest_inquisitor.css
533 ms
jquery.js
1003 ms
jquery-ui.js
1301 ms
jquery.metadata.js
664 ms
mbMenu.js
789 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
797 ms
lang.tr-TR.js
916 ms
uc.js
921 ms
init.js
931 ms
dropdown.js
1044 ms
main.js
1047 ms
grid.js
1051 ms
jquery.bt.js
1328 ms
bsn.AutoSuggest_2.1.3.js
1123 ms
string.js
1173 ms
jquery.scrollTo-min.js
1174 ms
jquery.cyclic-fade.js
1178 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1245 ms
WebResource.axd
673 ms
airport.js
674 ms
ga.js
8 ms
ScriptResource.axd
797 ms
ScriptResource.axd
728 ms
Criteria2.css
777 ms
WebSite.css
536 ms
marquee.js
530 ms
h_back_1.jpg
268 ms
but_line.png
178 ms
but_i.png
231 ms
but_ha.png
248 ms
but_f.png
249 ms
but_h.png
251 ms
line.png
293 ms
loading4.gif
353 ms
golge_krt.png
369 ms
text_hakkinda.png
377 ms
tursab.png
385 ms
line4.png
400 ms
tt_bilgi.png
417 ms
text_duyurular.png
481 ms
back_kay.png
630 ms
unisec.png
508 ms
footer_logo.png
517 ms
bullet1.png
533 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
logo.png
399 ms
lang.png
469 ms
box6.png
495 ms
but_giris.png
504 ms
menuHolder.png
522 ms
menu_2.png
523 ms
menu_1.png
596 ms
menu_3.png
616 ms
manset_back.png
625 ms
back.png
629 ms
flyP.png
626 ms
hotelP.png
619 ms
button.png
699 ms
duy_back.png
713 ms
2.gif
723 ms
flyA.png
686 ms
txtBack45.png
693 ms
box1.png
708 ms
fly.png
776 ms
box2.png
782 ms
cal.png
790 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
797 ms
turk.travel accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
turk.travel best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
turk.travel SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Turk.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Turk.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
turk.travel
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Turk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: