2 sec in total
194 ms
1.3 sec
479 ms
Visit txtsignal.com now to see the best up-to-date Txtsignal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about txtsignal.com
Reach customers, team members, and anyone else where they want to be reached. Send your first text message today. Try txtsignal now.
Visit txtsignal.comWe analyzed Txtsignal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
txtsignal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
194 ms
75 ms
180 ms
26 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Txtsignal.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (521 ms) relates to the external source 2c2.300.myftpupload.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (65%)
2.2 MB
778.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Txtsignal.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Txtsignal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 360.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 360.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Txtsignal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (54%)
52
24
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Txtsignal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
txtsignal.com
194 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
c42175c29d5be3ba115b2f28b3b7e21e.css
180 ms
css
26 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
243 ms
custom.css
143 ms
82e05a2570039e3a9a03783b0f85556d.css
134 ms
5c7cdf76034012a2509ab4f3cc421d1d.js
231 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
216 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
339 ms
ad0db2bbe4a90715a3129249726c7340.js
208 ms
referrer-cookie.js
102 ms
css
35 ms
jetpack.css
234 ms
wp-embed.min.js
373 ms
9fa3188c5e370f91880d9c2a8f3a6183.js
374 ms
js
29 ms
f3f994d45b158d20cc7196ba75f2f98c.js
478 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
aab5b441ba66fa804292bd761d56bf94.js
373 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
css
70 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
70 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
71 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
71 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
70 ms
ga.js
48 ms
events-api-client.js
47 ms
herobannerone-min.jpg
40 ms
quicksimple.jpg
41 ms
Intuitive.jpg
42 ms
support.jpg
521 ms
NewLogo.png
108 ms
FooterLogo.png
94 ms
AffordablePricing2.jpg
42 ms
logos.png
38 ms
keywords-64x64.png
37 ms
groups-64x64.png
37 ms
Invite-64x64.png
38 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff
79 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
79 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGHiec-hVyr2k4iOzEQsW1iE.woff
268 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
283 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMa9awK0IKUjIWABZIchFI8.woff
283 ms
gtm.js
250 ms
anonymous_users
49 ms
events
234 ms
utm.gif
217 ms
anonymous_users
237 ms
hovercard.css
48 ms
services.css
75 ms
loader.gif
79 ms
g.gif
6 ms
events
72 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
conversion_async.js
35 ms
fbevents.js
82 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
62 ms
39 ms
104 ms
75 ms
ga-audiences
63 ms
txtsignal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
txtsignal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
txtsignal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Txtsignal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Txtsignal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
txtsignal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Txtsignal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: