7.4 sec in total
2.1 sec
5.1 sec
149 ms
Click here to check amazing Typespec content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about typespec.co.uk
Visit typespec.co.ukWe analyzed Typespec.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
typespec.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
2115 ms
23 ms
36 ms
263 ms
170 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Typespec.co.uk, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Typespec.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 454.2 kB (34%)
1.4 MB
896.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Typespec.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 803.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Typespec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 345.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 345.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typespec.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (49%)
49
25
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typespec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.typespec.co.uk
2115 ms
css
23 ms
css
36 ms
style.css
263 ms
styles.css
170 ms
edd.min.css
271 ms
superfish.css
182 ms
prettyPhoto.css
270 ms
jquery.js
463 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
348 ms
ga.js
22 ms
TS-jpglogo-300x104.jpg
94 ms
icon_twitter.png
164 ms
icon_facebook.png
170 ms
Blesma-720x300.png
183 ms
TimmonsNY_970x300.jpg
380 ms
STM-04-12-14-NO-WATER-720x300.jpg
845 ms
MFRED_720x300.png
352 ms
Doves-970x300-4RG.jpg
717 ms
Topics-banner-out720x300.jpg
627 ms
TSicon1_32.png
366 ms
Puzzle_Gray_32.png
504 ms
Users_32.png
542 ms
Zapfpencil_32.png
562 ms
JC-hallmark_164x200px.png
707 ms
black_alpha_50.png
731 ms
tiptree_thumb.png
833 ms
Blesma-thumb-300x300-220x219.png
889 ms
RTS-head_200px.jpg
952 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
18 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
field_bkg.png
857 ms
btn_bkg.png
861 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
4 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
8 ms
sp_200px_normal.jpg
58 ms
jquery.form.min.js
670 ms
scripts.js
683 ms
superfish.js
720 ms
supersubs.js
736 ms
cycle.js
822 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
894 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
860 ms
theme_trust.js
862 ms
moment.js
1044 ms
langs.min.js
1311 ms
A-Z-Blurb-7x7-COVER-layout-A-50x50.jpg
1087 ms
TNY_300px-50x50.jpg
1017 ms
STM-04-12-14-300x300-50x50.jpg
1022 ms
Organon-Thumb300px-50x50.png
1051 ms
MFRED_300x300-50x50.png
1196 ms
ajax-loading.gif
1193 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
11 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
5 ms
slideshow_bullets.png
93 ms
typespec.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
typespec.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
typespec.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typespec.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Typespec.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
typespec.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Typespec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: