Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

typewolf.com

What’s Trending in Type · Typewolf

Page Load Speed

958 ms in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

363 ms

Page Rendered

519 ms

typewolf.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Typewolf content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about typewolf.com

Typewolf helps designers choose the perfect font combination for their next design project—features web fonts in the wild, font recommendations and learning resources.

Visit typewolf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Typewolf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 882 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

typewolf.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

typewolf.com

76 ms

www.typewolf.com

96 ms

typewolf_0046.css

10 ms

MyFontsWebfontsKit.js

9 ms

analytics.js

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Typewolf.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Hello.myfonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (119 ms) relates to the external source Hello.myfonts.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

528.4 kB

After Optimization

415.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Typewolf.com main page is 528.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 374.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 374.9 kB
  • After minification 374.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Typewolf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

  • Original 87.7 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typewolf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typewolf. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

typewolf.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

typewolf.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

typewolf.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typewolf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Typewolf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Typewolf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: