3.1 sec in total
825 ms
2 sec
279 ms
Welcome to cutr.usf.edu homepage info - get ready to check CUTR Usf best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cutr.usf.edu
Visit cutr.usf.eduWe analyzed Cutr.usf.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 825 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cutr.usf.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value22.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value4,350 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.749
6/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
825 ms
65 ms
85 ms
47 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Cutr.usf.edu, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Cutr.usf.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 923.4 kB (30%)
3.1 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Cutr.usf.edu main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CUTR Usf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 511.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 511.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 329.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cutr.usf.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 329.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (79%)
86
18
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CUTR Usf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cutr.usf.edu
825 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
65 ms
dashicons.min.css
85 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
47 ms
cn-user.min.css
55 ms
chosen.min.css
50 ms
settings.css
109 ms
css
28 ms
css
39 ms
css
57 ms
settings.css
85 ms
wp125.css
66 ms
pagenavi-css.css
84 ms
reset.css
88 ms
text.css
104 ms
960.css
105 ms
superfish.css
110 ms
prettyPhoto.css
130 ms
font-awesome.css
145 ms
style.css
168 ms
custom_style.css
126 ms
responsive.css
151 ms
style.css
134 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
150 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
174 ms
custom.css
156 ms
jquery.js
207 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
173 ms
lightbox.js
173 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
251 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
229 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
229 ms
core.min.js
123 ms
widget.min.js
126 ms
mouse.min.js
158 ms
resizable.min.js
158 ms
draggable.min.js
121 ms
button.min.js
126 ms
position.min.js
131 ms
dialog.min.js
141 ms
wpdialog.min.js
163 ms
picturefill.min.js
162 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
163 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
163 ms
cycle3_script.js
165 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
164 ms
custom_params.js
163 ms
superfish.combined.js
165 ms
script.js
172 ms
selectnav.min.js
174 ms
selectnav-options.js
180 ms
jquery.fullcalendar.min.js
177 ms
jquery.simplemodal.1.4.3.min.js
177 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
172 ms
jquery.jgrowl.min.js
241 ms
datepicker.min.js
239 ms
jquery.init_show_calendar.js
224 ms
wp-embed.min.js
224 ms
ga.js
29 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
feedback-btn.png
43 ms
cutrlogo.png
40 ms
searchbox.png
39 ms
twitter-icon.png
42 ms
facebook-icon.png
40 ms
linkedin-icon.png
40 ms
email-icon.png
295 ms
rss-icon.png
297 ms
main-menu-btm-border.png
297 ms
usfintro_940x400.jpg
305 ms
39048.JPG
300 ms
AVIslider.jpg
298 ms
spacer.gif
297 ms
1046.JPG
297 ms
legoland-2.jpg
300 ms
cleancities2.jpg
300 ms
NASCAR-2.jpg
297 ms
2014-BullsWalkBikev1.jpg
300 ms
slider-controls.png
301 ms
home-page-content-top.png
301 ms
heading_underline.png
301 ms
ad_030316.png
301 ms
rss.png
303 ms
double-arrow.png
304 ms
banner51.gif
304 ms
slider-bullet.png
25 ms
auto-arrows.png
22 ms
cutr.usf.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cutr.usf.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cutr.usf.edu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cutr.usf.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cutr.usf.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cutr.usf.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CUTR Usf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: