3.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.5 sec
123 ms
Welcome to feedback.userecho.com homepage info - get ready to check Feedback User Echo best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about feedback.userecho.com
UserEcho Support Portal - find answers on your questions
Visit feedback.userecho.comWe analyzed Feedback.userecho.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
feedback.userecho.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
16/100
10%
1171 ms
274 ms
547 ms
565 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Feedback.userecho.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Feedback.userecho.com.
Page size can be reduced by 380.2 kB (66%)
573.5 kB
193.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedback.userecho.com main page is 573.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 260.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.1 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Feedback User Echo needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedback.userecho.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (45%)
58
32
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedback User Echo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedback.userecho.com
1171 ms
font-awesome.min.css
274 ms
bootstrap.min.css
547 ms
ae440aacc4eb.css
565 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
514 ms
123 ms
93323128f1a6.js
874 ms
close.png
196 ms
loading.gif
196 ms
prev.png
127 ms
next.png
127 ms
0bdd70e2c8434656d7cd9b1581fd7b72.png
281 ms
44db70fb790763ea1b182086b3e3b227.png
194 ms
94fc42fcbd8cbf61e584c5dd5c939729.png
284 ms
4a5b4a1d10263c58e8c3ba64bbdd5840.png
288 ms
792075aa04e9e1ad47a5ed0042bfa1a3.png
380 ms
b47748f27d87a40eb553fa119a0b434c.png
376 ms
739da407b38348c1cd9a2341ea661f4d.png
465 ms
ccc286cafc9edff13fc288f30084c4e4.png
477 ms
project_logo.png
477 ms
1b586e6c16a526b084faa7838f5cc6b6.png
558 ms
poweredby_ue.png
564 ms
e907306aaecd755537d5dbd0207e3519
368 ms
0ccbb0e38882e26f25f692be78a22beb
126 ms
f70e785b1cb1a52832e763df9ddf8e0c
168 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
548 ms
71.png
60 ms
sdk.js
27 ms
widgets.js
93 ms
82.png
614 ms
82 ms
xd_arbiter.php
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
61 ms
75.png
6 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
133 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
46 ms
page.php
111 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
17 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
23 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
45 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
33 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
28 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
28 ms
syndication
149 ms
339335652510412800
178 ms
4998_10151406295566400_721169062_n.jpg
67 ms
12346311_10153134457986400_6883949434023844987_n.png
130 ms
307051_258281377544578_856797952_n.jpg
51 ms
12741991_648894925249470_8356474297122064619_n.jpg
49 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
37 ms
12670240_1567834303539879_4292732822510408791_n.jpg
51 ms
12118749_10153353361246339_8494017623921200059_n.jpg
66 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
30 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
29 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
28 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
57 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
5 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
9 ms
feedback.userecho.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
feedback.userecho.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
feedback.userecho.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedback.userecho.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedback.userecho.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedback.userecho.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feedback User Echo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: