3.1 sec in total
57 ms
2.5 sec
495 ms
Visit online.ulm.edu now to see the best up-to-date Online Ulm content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about online.ulm.edu
Apply to a ULM Online Program today! Prepare to learn, succeed and compete in an ever-changing global society through a transformative education with our high-quality, 100% online degrees and programs...
Visit online.ulm.eduWe analyzed Online.ulm.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
online.ulm.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value2,400 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
57 ms
18 ms
66 ms
96 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Online.ulm.edu, 6% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (483 ms) relates to the external source Snap.licdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 127.0 kB (13%)
1.0 MB
874.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Online.ulm.edu main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 604.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Online Ulm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Online.ulm.edu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (80%)
105
21
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Online Ulm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
online.ulm.edu
57 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
style.min.css
66 ms
dashicons.min.css
96 ms
font-awesome.min.css
61 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
63 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
52 ms
swiper.min.css
59 ms
post-115.css
92 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
72 ms
post-109.css
106 ms
post-78.css
69 ms
post-102.css
129 ms
post-255.css
92 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
97 ms
post-562.css
96 ms
fontawesome.min.css
133 ms
brands.min.css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
app.min.js
115 ms
app.min.js
118 ms
app.min.js
119 ms
global.min.js
162 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
159 ms
cse.js
96 ms
117921503.js
92 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
159 ms
jquery.json.min.js
194 ms
gravityforms.min.js
158 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
157 ms
solid.min.css
196 ms
post-267.css
158 ms
post-6686.css
190 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
191 ms
maxmegamenu.js
193 ms
public.js
192 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
193 ms
bxslider.js
89 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
102 ms
core.min.js
196 ms
mouse.min.js
242 ms
sortable.min.js
149 ms
gsurvey.min.js
147 ms
app.min.js
145 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
159 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
158 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
153 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
130 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
129 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
166 ms
hooks.min.js
167 ms
i18n.min.js
165 ms
frontend.min.js
164 ms
waypoints.min.js
165 ms
frontend.min.js
212 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
170 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
161 ms
utag.js
165 ms
ulm-tile-001-2.png
133 ms
ulm-logo.svg
92 ms
phone.png
132 ms
ulm-hero-home.jpg
136 ms
ulm-bucket-education.jpg
134 ms
ulm-bucket-about.jpg
135 ms
ulm-bucket-excellence.jpg
147 ms
ulm-bucket-scholarship.jpg
146 ms
ulm-bucket-diversity.jpg
284 ms
ulm-bucket-RESPONSIBILITY.jpg
285 ms
cse_element__en.js
42 ms
default+en.css
74 ms
default.css
78 ms
ulm-bucket-integrity.jpg
276 ms
ulm-bucket-service.jpg
275 ms
ulm-bucket-sacscoc.svg
277 ms
ulm-bucket-ccne.svg
274 ms
ulm-bucket-caep.svg
276 ms
ulm-logo-seal.svg
278 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
9 ms
ulm-tile-002.png
149 ms
ktag.js
72 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
176 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
190 ms
gtm.js
233 ms
js
270 ms
fs.js
305 ms
insight.min.js
483 ms
bat.js
474 ms
fbevents.js
294 ms
i.gif
450 ms
utag.7215.js
167 ms
utag.7241.js
224 ms
js
233 ms
js
230 ms
js
222 ms
utag.v.js
41 ms
305 ms
295 ms
185108315589057
233 ms
web
192 ms
analytics.js
167 ms
28 ms
22 ms
page
89 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
34 ms
ga-audiences
56 ms
integrations
55 ms
latest.js
14 ms
online.ulm.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
online.ulm.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
online.ulm.edu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Online.ulm.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Online.ulm.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
online.ulm.edu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Online Ulm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: