Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ubersmith.com

Ubersmith | Subscription Business Management

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

680 ms

ubersmith.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ubersmith.com homepage info - get ready to check Ubersmith best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ubersmith.com

Discover Ubersmith, the all-in-one solution for subscription business management. Streamline operations, automate billing, and scale your business effortlessly.

Visit ubersmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ubersmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ubersmith.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,130 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ubersmith.com

50 ms

www.ubersmith.com

129 ms

bZDhDoMwCIRfyK7z1x7HVMTKQstWMMa3X2dMtsT-5O67I9B7kGwBzM1Sknt4ysDrhOpB1avtjNr1_vlesewOhDm8FJ24FIzAM8XFhgOrVBGrao62IdpfQ3f364hFE9nSUH6blpq7JcoXe2SJTePIDdOeQyK4uHO9zYUNVRJehGYfMsZQGapvOdubHEk-mXM6hi_6AQ.css

206 ms

M9AvTUotKs7NLMnQTy4u1s_JzEtN1M1Mzs8r1i8uqcxJBQA.css

78 ms

ZYxRCoAwDEMvJHaeaMxacGK3sXTCbq_4o-hfyMuLozZLhUZbiQGqgpIT4iGjxjS4D4b1XfzSU9DI_hkPE23wnLVkSKUAiOE2XvXvjRssq7_iCQ.css

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ubersmith.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (836 ms) relates to the external source P.typekit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (58%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Ubersmith.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 101.6 kB
  • After minification 98.8 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ubersmith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 410.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 237.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ubersmith.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (48%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ubersmith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ubersmith.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ubersmith.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ubersmith.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ubersmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ubersmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ubersmith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: