Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ultrashape.com

Patient | Medical Aesthetic Brands | Candela Medical

Page Load Speed

933 ms in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

594 ms

Page Rendered

279 ms

ultrashape.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ultrashape.com now to see the best up-to-date Ultrashape content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultrashape.com

Candela's medical aesthetic brands for laser skin resurfacing, IPL skin revitalization, laser hair removal, tattoo removal, micro-needling, spider veins, rosacea, acne scars, and so much more.

Visit ultrashape.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrashape.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 873 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrashape.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ultrashape.com

60 ms

css_jxjd3y05gJ4znkc8IUPVWEgEf2rbAK_s9sEjW7BOSvU.css

7 ms

css_botNHIYRQPys-RH2iA3U4LbV9bPNRS64tLAs8ec1ch8.css

30 ms

css_e9i1o2m_GsLXCsIe3pJwpeNkUjTw8sddNBrCOrjat7I.css

7 ms

bootstrap.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrashape.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (168 ms) relates to the external source 620-hcu-218.mktoresp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 250.9 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

976.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Ultrashape.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 864.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 864.0 kB
  • After minification 861.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultrashape images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 114.1 kB

  • Original 195.4 kB
  • After minification 176.0 kB
  • After compression 81.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 120.3 kB

  • Original 147.7 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB
  • After compression 27.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrashape.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (64%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultrashape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

ultrashape.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrashape.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultrashape.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultrashape. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: