Tools & Wizards About Us
ultratc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ultratc.com

Ultra Tokyo Connection

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

75 ms

ultratc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ultra Tc content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultratc.com

Ultra Tokyo Connection is a North American wholesale distributor for “Otaku Goods” such as anime figures, model kits, plush toys, and more.

Visit ultratc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultratc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultratc.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultratc.com

30 ms

www.ultratc.com

305 ms

droggol-pack-2.css

20 ms

web.assets_common.min.css

108 ms

web.assets_frontend.min.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Ultratc.com, 38% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.odoocdn.com and 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.odoocdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.0 kB (32%)

Content Size

291.6 kB

After Optimization

198.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ultratc.com main page is 291.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 165.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 29.9 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 84.5 kB
  • After minification 60.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultra Tc needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 165.9 kB
  • After minification 165.9 kB
  • After compression 121.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultratc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Tc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ultratc.com

ultratc.com

30 ms

www.ultratc.com

www.ultratc.com

305 ms

droggol-pack-2.css

droggol-pack-2.css

20 ms

web.assets_common.min.css

web.assets_common.min.css

108 ms

web.assets_frontend.min.css

web.assets_frontend.min.css

159 ms

web.assets_common_minimal.min.js

web.assets_common_minimal.min.js

105 ms

web.assets_frontend_minimal.min.js

web.assets_frontend_minimal.min.js

102 ms

js

js

62 ms

cookieconsent.css

cookieconsent.css

18 ms

css

css

59 ms

css

css

78 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

145 ms

Ultra%20Tokyo%20Connection

Ultra%20Tokyo%20Connection

142 ms

logo

logo

286 ms

001_logo.png

001_logo.png

120 ms

002_logo.png

002_logo.png

121 ms

003_logo.png

003_logo.png

191 ms

010_logo.png

010_logo.png

200 ms

048_logo.png

048_logo.png

231 ms

012_logo.png

012_logo.png

350 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

58 ms

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

43 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

79 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

58 ms

Roboto-Medium-webfont.woff

Roboto-Medium-webfont.woff

99 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

57 ms

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

105 ms

Roboto-Thin-webfont.woff

Roboto-Thin-webfont.woff

114 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

57 ms

Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff

Roboto-Bold-webfont.woff

126 ms

Roboto-Black-webfont.woff

Roboto-Black-webfont.woff

125 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

66 ms

NotoSansArabic-Reg.woff

NotoSansArabic-Reg.woff

77 ms

NotoSansHebrew-Reg.woff

NotoSansHebrew-Reg.woff

87 ms

NotoSans-Reg.woff

NotoSans-Reg.woff

134 ms

NotoSansArabic-Lig.woff

NotoSansArabic-Lig.woff

113 ms

NotoSansHebrew-Lig.woff

NotoSansHebrew-Lig.woff

123 ms

NotoSans-Lig.woff

NotoSans-Lig.woff

111 ms

NotoSansArabic-Hai.woff

NotoSansArabic-Hai.woff

110 ms

NotoSansHebrew-Hai.woff

NotoSansHebrew-Hai.woff

102 ms

NotoSans-Hai.woff

NotoSans-Hai.woff

120 ms

NotoSansArabic-Bol.woff

NotoSansArabic-Bol.woff

121 ms

NotoSansHebrew-Bol.woff

NotoSansHebrew-Bol.woff

120 ms

NotoSans-Bol.woff

NotoSans-Bol.woff

134 ms

NotoSansArabic-Bla.woff

NotoSansArabic-Bla.woff

134 ms

NotoSansHebrew-Bla.woff

NotoSansHebrew-Bla.woff

133 ms

NotoSans-Bla.woff

NotoSans-Bla.woff

134 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

267 ms

Droggol-Pack.ttf

Droggol-Pack.ttf

138 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

62 ms

Roboto-RegularItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-RegularItalic-webfont.woff

263 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

61 ms

Roboto-MediumItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-MediumItalic-webfont.woff

368 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

61 ms

Roboto-LightItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-LightItalic-webfont.woff

252 ms

Roboto-ThinItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-ThinItalic-webfont.woff

299 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

60 ms

Roboto-BoldItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-BoldItalic-webfont.woff

371 ms

Roboto-BlackItalic-webfont.woff

Roboto-BlackItalic-webfont.woff

458 ms

NotoSansArabic-RegIta.woff

NotoSansArabic-RegIta.woff

576 ms

NotoSansHebrew-RegIta.woff

NotoSansHebrew-RegIta.woff

579 ms

NotoSans-RegIta.woff

NotoSans-RegIta.woff

587 ms

NotoSansArabic-LigIta.woff

NotoSansArabic-LigIta.woff

590 ms

NotoSansHebrew-LigIta.woff

NotoSansHebrew-LigIta.woff

591 ms

NotoSans-LigIta.woff

NotoSans-LigIta.woff

596 ms

NotoSansArabic-HaiIta.woff

NotoSansArabic-HaiIta.woff

852 ms

NotoSansHebrew-HaiIta.woff

NotoSansHebrew-HaiIta.woff

839 ms

NotoSans-HaiIta.woff

NotoSans-HaiIta.woff

849 ms

NotoSansArabic-BolIta.woff

NotoSansArabic-BolIta.woff

1013 ms

NotoSansHebrew-BolIta.woff

NotoSansHebrew-BolIta.woff

1051 ms

NotoSans-BolIta.woff

NotoSans-BolIta.woff

936 ms

NotoSansArabic-BlaIta.woff

NotoSansArabic-BlaIta.woff

1098 ms

NotoSansHebrew-BlaIta.woff

NotoSansHebrew-BlaIta.woff

1106 ms

NotoSans-BlaIta.woff

NotoSans-BlaIta.woff

1207 ms

main.js

main.js

267 ms

Accessibility Review

ultratc.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ultratc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ultratc.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultratc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultratc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultratc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ultra Tc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: