Tools & Wizards About Us
umel.mx screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    35% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

umel.mx

UMEL Cirugía México | Los mejores cirujanos certificados

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

umel.mx screenshot

About Website

Visit umel.mx now to see the best up-to-date UMEL content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about umel.mx

UMEL Cirugía México te pone en contacto con los mejores cirujanos plásticos y estéticos certificados en México.

Visit umel.mx

Key Findings

We analyzed Umel.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

umel.mx performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value69,180 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value86.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

umel.mx

162 ms

portal.umel.mx

2313 ms

style.css

232 ms

css

24 ms

main.css

575 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Umel.mx, 81% (39 requests) were made to Portal.umel.mx and 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Portal.umel.mx.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 543.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Umel.mx main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 27.9 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UMEL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 186.1 kB

  • Original 249.5 kB
  • After minification 199.9 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 296.9 kB

  • Original 335.3 kB
  • After minification 257.6 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Umel.mx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (37%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UMEL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

umel.mx

umel.mx

162 ms

portal.umel.mx

portal.umel.mx

2313 ms

style.css

style.css

232 ms

css

css

24 ms

main.css

main.css

575 ms

theme.php

theme.php

2058 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

444 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

355 ms

main.js

main.js

400 ms

theme.php

theme.php

3400 ms

extra.css

extra.css

195 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

212 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

237 ms

public.css

public.css

251 ms

default.css

default.css

273 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

286 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

309 ms

bground.jpg

bground.jpg

124 ms

logo_umel.gif

logo_umel.gif

98 ms

calcula.jpg

calcula.jpg

97 ms

Carrusel_Umel_Slider.jpg

Carrusel_Umel_Slider.jpg

176 ms

slider0001.jpg

slider0001.jpg

209 ms

slider0002.jpg

slider0002.jpg

353 ms

slider0003.jpg

slider0003.jpg

354 ms

imagen-code.png

imagen-code.png

468 ms

inversion_pagos.png

inversion_pagos.png

354 ms

aprendizaje_linea.png

aprendizaje_linea.png

355 ms

inscribete.png

inscribete.png

353 ms

licenciatura.png

licenciatura.png

357 ms

calcula_beca.png

calcula_beca.png

376 ms

bg-form.png

bg-form.png

328 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

328 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

330 ms

youtube.jpg

youtube.jpg

331 ms

link.jpg

link.jpg

355 ms

fotter.jpg

fotter.jpg

393 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

63 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

64 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

64 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

65 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

64 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

298 ms

bg_menu_arrow.png

bg_menu_arrow.png

299 ms

btn_arrow-up.png

btn_arrow-up.png

322 ms

btn_camera_left.png

btn_camera_left.png

292 ms

btn_camera_right2.png

btn_camera_right2.png

300 ms

widget_v2.135.js

widget_v2.135.js

17 ms

__$$__stringtable_lang_es.js

__$$__stringtable_lang_es.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

umel.mx accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

umel.mx best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

umel.mx SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Umel.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Umel.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

umel.mx

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of UMEL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: