Tools & Wizards About Us
undefapplication.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

undefapplication.org

Applying for an UNDEF project grant and selection process | Democracy Fund

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

715 ms

Page Rendered

140 ms

undefapplication.org screenshot

About Website

Visit undefapplication.org now to see the best up-to-date UNDEF Application content for Nigeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about undefapplication.org

Cliquer ici pour accéder à la version en français. UNDEF supports projects that strengthen the voice of civil society, promote human rights, and encourage the participation of all groups in democratic...

Visit undefapplication.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Undefapplication.org page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 855 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

undefapplication.org performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

application-window

215 ms

css_ypHvFcqVcnClHB7XHIQ2VL8kZ7J6u-YGiGxBSnkob5Q.css

45 ms

css_vZ_wrMQ9Og-YPPxa1q4us3N7DsZMJa-14jShHgRoRNo.css

51 ms

css_sCyenpBQ_eKr_Enmf79c2g_Af7yjmN_iWFbbI5Rg3cg.css

52 ms

css_KpHsFsHL5G3x9EUJr5pMqQKsGs4fdCXEGrY6HhOgLHA.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Undefapplication.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (215 ms) relates to the external source Un.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 287.2 kB (72%)

Content Size

399.7 kB

After Optimization

112.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Undefapplication.org main page is 399.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 260.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 21.3 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, UNDEF Application needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 187.2 kB

  • Original 260.4 kB
  • After minification 201.7 kB
  • After compression 73.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 83.6 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Undefapplication.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (76%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UNDEF Application. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

application-window

application-window

215 ms

css_ypHvFcqVcnClHB7XHIQ2VL8kZ7J6u-YGiGxBSnkob5Q.css

css_ypHvFcqVcnClHB7XHIQ2VL8kZ7J6u-YGiGxBSnkob5Q.css

45 ms

css_vZ_wrMQ9Og-YPPxa1q4us3N7DsZMJa-14jShHgRoRNo.css

css_vZ_wrMQ9Og-YPPxa1q4us3N7DsZMJa-14jShHgRoRNo.css

51 ms

css_sCyenpBQ_eKr_Enmf79c2g_Af7yjmN_iWFbbI5Rg3cg.css

css_sCyenpBQ_eKr_Enmf79c2g_Af7yjmN_iWFbbI5Rg3cg.css

52 ms

css_KpHsFsHL5G3x9EUJr5pMqQKsGs4fdCXEGrY6HhOgLHA.css

css_KpHsFsHL5G3x9EUJr5pMqQKsGs4fdCXEGrY6HhOgLHA.css

53 ms

css_N801rVt0u9vwyl6fETuOJr10CrEXbJEcns3eQYoNlgo.css

css_N801rVt0u9vwyl6fETuOJr10CrEXbJEcns3eQYoNlgo.css

54 ms

css_K_7KMeY4Rud-BSdgS_3mYZHdEp4O8HzHVcyvvSOdUpY.css

css_K_7KMeY4Rud-BSdgS_3mYZHdEp4O8HzHVcyvvSOdUpY.css

54 ms

css_RkStZuuKMTkSzGOnHhHfNhbSjJKlAbfS-lgcZlnYvFc.css

css_RkStZuuKMTkSzGOnHhHfNhbSjJKlAbfS-lgcZlnYvFc.css

67 ms

css_Po0mmgYol8C68mO0ra4gFmexPkpBAtRbt_1NndZAYuo.css

css_Po0mmgYol8C68mO0ra4gFmexPkpBAtRbt_1NndZAYuo.css

86 ms

js_UWQINlriydSoeSiGQxToOUdv493zEa7dpsXC1OtYlZU.js

js_UWQINlriydSoeSiGQxToOUdv493zEa7dpsXC1OtYlZU.js

161 ms

js_pcG4nozC_WcLiZGYbq1zfRAv88ony8ZmiwgBXaRG1ik.js

js_pcG4nozC_WcLiZGYbq1zfRAv88ony8ZmiwgBXaRG1ik.js

97 ms

js_JMYQ_3Pa89JwWuFVHKWMK8HVz3eoa_x4i2eQwi8HoX0.js

js_JMYQ_3Pa89JwWuFVHKWMK8HVz3eoa_x4i2eQwi8HoX0.js

179 ms

js_otbQfsAf6enLw8FRHdcCXQVkA0moiK6h3nJpZExE1PQ.js

js_otbQfsAf6enLw8FRHdcCXQVkA0moiK6h3nJpZExE1PQ.js

74 ms

js_UhNEmkDzwq0Jj7dfGmouV4_xOnk-yrXt4u8M2ZuaJsY.js

js_UhNEmkDzwq0Jj7dfGmouV4_xOnk-yrXt4u8M2ZuaJsY.js

93 ms

js_ivGX4BAlq8_3MnHW1n3ic9aobm_ofAqmftBGkzv9fvU.js

js_ivGX4BAlq8_3MnHW1n3ic9aobm_ofAqmftBGkzv9fvU.js

99 ms

ga.js

ga.js

51 ms

page_bg.gif

page_bg.gif

27 ms

top_bg.gif

top_bg.gif

26 ms

logo-mobile.png

logo-mobile.png

28 ms

ico_home.png

ico_home.png

28 ms

select-arrow.gif

select-arrow.gif

28 ms

ico_search.png

ico_search.png

27 ms

menu_bg.gif

menu_bg.gif

50 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

51 ms

social-ico-facebook.png

social-ico-facebook.png

53 ms

social-ico-youtube.png

social-ico-youtube.png

55 ms

page_heading_bg.jpg

page_heading_bg.jpg

55 ms

menu-leaf.png

menu-leaf.png

56 ms

dd_arrow.gif

dd_arrow.gif

75 ms

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

138 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

Accessibility Review

undefapplication.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

undefapplication.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

undefapplication.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Undefapplication.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Undefapplication.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

undefapplication.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of UNDEF Application. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: