Tools & Wizards About Us
urbanatom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

urbanatom.com

Page Load Speed

15.9 sec in total

First Response

7.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

97 ms

urbanatom.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to urbanatom.com homepage info - get ready to check Urbanatom best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about urbanatom.com

Everything That Matters, And More

Visit urbanatom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Urbanatom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.7 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

urbanatom.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

urbanatom.com

7740 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

83 ms

css

26 ms

style.css

137 ms

font-awesome.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Urbanatom.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Urbanatom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.0 kB (68%)

Content Size

394.3 kB

After Optimization

124.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Urbanatom.com main page is 394.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 269.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 165.5 kB

  • Original 269.0 kB
  • After minification 263.1 kB
  • After compression 103.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 98.1 kB
  • After minification 72.6 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Urbanatom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (81%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Urbanatom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

urbanatom.com

urbanatom.com

7740 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

83 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

137 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

118 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

86 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

93 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

174 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

135 ms

colormag-custom.js

colormag-custom.js

121 ms

html5shiv.min.js

html5shiv.min.js

130 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

165 ms

colormag-slider-setting.js

colormag-slider-setting.js

166 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

167 ms

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

192 ms

ticker-setting.js

ticker-setting.js

191 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

191 ms

sticky-setting.js

sticky-setting.js

207 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

232 ms

image-popup-setting.js

image-popup-setting.js

212 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

228 ms

fitvids-setting.js

fitvids-setting.js

227 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

8 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

7 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

collect

collect

96 ms

page.js

page.js

21 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

103 ms

Accessibility Review

urbanatom.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

urbanatom.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

urbanatom.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Urbanatom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Urbanatom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

urbanatom.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: