8.8 sec in total
1.8 sec
5.8 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Usedlook content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usedlook.net
usedlook.net moda ve yaşama dair son trendleri, ipuçlarını vb merak edeceğiniz tüm içerikleri takip edebileceğiniz bir blogtur.
Visit usedlook.netWe analyzed Usedlook.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
usedlook.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value16.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.321
36/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
1764 ms
426 ms
434 ms
296 ms
298 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Usedlook.net, 24% (12 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Usedlook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 308.3 kB (13%)
2.4 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Usedlook.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Usedlook images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usedlook.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)
43
22
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usedlook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.usedlook.net
1764 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
426 ms
style.css
434 ms
slicknav.css
296 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
298 ms
font-awesome.min.css
4 ms
responsive.css
309 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
jetpack.css
522 ms
style.css
441 ms
jquery.js
742 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
462 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
318 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
331 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
341 ms
fitvids.js
370 ms
solopine.js
411 ms
wp-embed.min.js
458 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
924970_1587247708266071_641822960_n.jpg
73 ms
10953912_902417713209199_356464130_n.jpg
174 ms
12424666_586155644875064_1947001976_n.jpg
69 ms
12748345_196656084028261_1911582598_n.jpg
81 ms
12748207_232328963768708_1688733473_n.jpg
70 ms
12750009_885136234938764_435820980_n.jpg
71 ms
12568869_926404267467281_1040653357_n.jpg
73 ms
12558389_1523975544563329_1375329922_n.jpg
107 ms
12547745_443620642499229_1401835324_n.jpg
71 ms
12362153_1727202560845595_583867827_n.jpg
70 ms
917919_230067823992341_697271690_n.jpg
72 ms
12357848_961222143943589_830415052_n.jpg
409 ms
UsedLook_Logo_Fin1.png
407 ms
DSC_0113-1080x715.jpg
584 ms
Ekran-Resmi-2016-01-19-01.04.21-1080x604.png
2228 ms
Desktop47-1080x764.jpg
574 ms
colours-1080x718.jpg
615 ms
spl1173295_012-1080x695.jpg
878 ms
LgcV55siz7BRNdbO3Huj5g.ttf
26 ms
AcvTq8Q0lyKKNxRlL28Rn6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
96 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
29 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
38 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CWZo45h2iflZEIuZunOF0XY.ttf
40 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIETnlckwlsa9ycyidjAp5Kc.ttf
38 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3 ms
hovercard.css
59 ms
services.css
59 ms
controls.png
147 ms
g.gif
8 ms
usedlook.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
usedlook.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
usedlook.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
TR
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usedlook.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usedlook.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usedlook.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usedlook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: