Tools & Wizards About Us
userradar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

userradar.com

GitLab

Page Load Speed

28.9 sec in total

First Response

2.6 sec

Resources Loaded

26.1 sec

Page Rendered

238 ms

userradar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Userradar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about userradar.com

GitLab Community Edition

Visit userradar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Userradar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 26.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

userradar.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

userradar.com

2564 ms

eur.analysys.cn

1479 ms

qianfan.analysys.cn

2509 ms

index.css

1125 ms

index-logo.png

1431 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Userradar.com, 81% (25 requests) were made to Qianfan.analysys.cn and 6% (2 requests) were made to Imguserradar.analysys.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.2 sec) relates to the external source Qianfan.analysys.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

96.6 kB

After Optimization

52.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Userradar.com main page is 96.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 62.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 33.7 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 62.9 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Userradar needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (54%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Userradar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

userradar.com

userradar.com

2564 ms

eur.analysys.cn

eur.analysys.cn

1479 ms

qianfan.analysys.cn

qianfan.analysys.cn

2509 ms

index.css

index.css

1125 ms

index-logo.png

index-logo.png

1431 ms

index-icon-b.png

index-icon-b.png

1238 ms

reset.css

reset.css

535 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

3244 ms

table.css

table.css

2557 ms

main.css

main.css

3306 ms

common.css

common.css

1517 ms

analysysdate.css

analysysdate.css

1062 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

1584 ms

jquery-seajs.js

jquery-seajs.js

10967 ms

seajs-wrap.js

seajs-wrap.js

1917 ms

mobileImg.png

mobileImg.png

2518 ms

home-contact-a.png

home-contact-a.png

13142 ms

index-logo.png

index-logo.png

4981 ms

index-icon-b.png

index-icon-b.png

19164 ms

div-a-bg2.png

div-a-bg2.png

4450 ms

div-a-bg1.png

div-a-bg1.png

7172 ms

all-index-icon1.png

all-index-icon1.png

7473 ms

home-contact-b.png

home-contact-b.png

4841 ms

iconCom.png

iconCom.png

6928 ms

main.js

main.js

373 ms

hm.js

hm.js

666 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

377 ms

avalon.js

avalon.js

495 ms

common.js

common.js

5702 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

285 ms

jquery-scrollTo.js

jquery-scrollTo.js

370 ms

SEO Factors

userradar.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Userradar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Userradar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

userradar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Userradar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: