4.4 sec in total
189 ms
2.8 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to kindersitz.vergleich.org homepage info - get ready to check Kindersitz Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about kindersitz.vergleich.org
llll➤ Aktueller und unabhängiger Kindersitz Test bzw. Vergleich 2023 inkl. ✓ Vergleichssieger, ✓ Preis-Leistungs-Sieger uvm. ➤ Jetzt vergleichen!
Visit kindersitz.vergleich.orgWe analyzed Kindersitz.vergleich.org page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
kindersitz.vergleich.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
189 ms
750 ms
68 ms
62 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Kindersitz.vergleich.org, 98% (79 requests) were made to Cdn.vergleich.org and 1% (1 request) were made to Vergleich.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.vergleich.org.
Page size can be reduced by 359.7 kB (29%)
1.3 MB
891.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Kindersitz.vergleich.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 446.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 358.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 358.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 237 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kindersitz Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 647 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 358 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kindersitz.vergleich.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (25%)
79
59
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kindersitz Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kindersitz.vergleich.org
189 ms
www.vergleich.org
750 ms
app.16.3.136.3.css
68 ms
header-search.74.3.136.3.css
62 ms
index.104.3.136.3.css
62 ms
press.0.3.136.3.css
67 ms
search-bar-home.126.3.136.3.css
65 ms
product-ads-desktop.117.3.136.3.css
65 ms
similar-comparisons.9.3.136.3.css
62 ms
desktop-tuev-seal.49.3.136.3.css
66 ms
vergleichorg-logo.svg
112 ms
idx-s.jpg
118 ms
labor.jpg
51 ms
methoden-1.jpg
19 ms
ziele.jpg
26 ms
sueddeutsche-zeitung.svg
45 ms
tagesspiegel.svg
26 ms
ntv.svg
40 ms
das-erste.svg
17 ms
focus.svg
51 ms
stern.svg
46 ms
auto-motorrad.jpeg
107 ms
baumarkt.jpg
49 ms
drogerie.jpg
106 ms
elektronik.jpg
183 ms
finanzen-1.jpg
187 ms
freizeit.jpg
186 ms
haushalt.jpg
184 ms
schlafbedarf-fuer-kinder-und-babys.jpg
186 ms
tests-und-vergleiche-kategorie-lebensmittel.png
187 ms
mode.jpg
190 ms
service.jpg
188 ms
wohnen.jpg
188 ms
mietvertrag.jpg
2061 ms
auto-lenkrad-test.jpeg
190 ms
roulette-casino.jpg
188 ms
gluecksspiel-sportwetten.jpeg
189 ms
lotto-vergleich-test.jpg
191 ms
shutterstock_252511228.jpg
193 ms
kampa-me0531e.jpg
191 ms
jbl-partybox-stage-120-in-schwarz-tragbare-bluetooth-lautsprecher-box-pro-sound-lichtshow-ki-sou.jpg
191 ms
tourit-kuhlelemente.jpg
193 ms
veektomx-10000mah-zwart.jpg
193 ms
estarer-kuhlrucksack-picknichrucksack.jpg
194 ms
blesion-bfw4p001.jpg
198 ms
growshop24.svg
194 ms
kenwood-schnitzelwerk-at340.jpg
196 ms
clearfee-coffee-to-go-becher-aus-pappe.jpg
200 ms
stanley-classic-legendary-thermoskanne.jpg
190 ms
linodino-kindersofa.jpg
186 ms
natural-elements-mariendistel-mit-artischocke-038-loewenzahn-219.jpg
188 ms
ashton-and-wright-aw-ds.jpg
167 ms
easace-ruckenkratzer.jpg
169 ms
bestonzon-camping-toaster.jpg
162 ms
primus-camping-besteck-set.jpg
160 ms
bokihuk-solar-lichterkette.jpg
161 ms
enbw-1.png
105 ms
spirella-etna.jpg
124 ms
yescapa.png
126 ms
b00pbbsqou.jpg
54 ms
allianz.svg
52 ms
runtime.122.3.136.3.js
44 ms
header-search.74.3.136.3.js
43 ms
search-bar-algolia-wrapper.125.3.136.3.js
43 ms
index.104.3.136.3.js
43 ms
press.0.3.136.3.js
42 ms
search-bar-home.126.3.136.3.js
43 ms
product-ads-desktop.117.3.136.3.js
42 ms
similar-comparisons.9.3.136.3.js
43 ms
desktop-tuev-seal.49.3.136.3.js
42 ms
app.25.3.136.3.js
45 ms
app.131.3.136.3.js
51 ms
app.16.3.136.3.js
44 ms
sa2.js
45 ms
taboola_ads.js
48 ms
tarnel-bqls-b-1.jpg
65 ms
2-in-1.jpg
59 ms
sc45386-www-vergleich-org-siegel-vgl-gepr-onlineportal-2023zw.svg
61 ms
fr.svg
56 ms
apple-app-store-badge-264x88-1.png
55 ms
google-play-badge-297x88-1.png
61 ms
kindersitz.vergleich.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
kindersitz.vergleich.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
kindersitz.vergleich.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kindersitz.vergleich.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kindersitz.vergleich.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kindersitz.vergleich.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kindersitz Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: