Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

kredit.vergleich.de

Ratenkredit Vergleich 12/2023: Jetzt Top-Zins sichern!

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

kredit.vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to kredit.vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Kredit Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about kredit.vergleich.de

Sie möchten einen Kredit aufnehmen? Unser Kreditvergleich zeigt günstige Kredite für Ihre Wünsche. √ Online-Kredite vergleichen √ aktuelle Kreditzinsen

Visit kredit.vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Kredit.vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kredit.vergleich.de performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kredit.vergleich.de

352 ms

ratenkredit-vergleich.html

797 ms

gtm.js

174 ms

uc.js

26 ms

polyfill.js

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Kredit.vergleich.de, 96% (124 requests) were made to Vergleich.de and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Vergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 199.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Kredit.vergleich.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 993.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 106.2 kB

  • Original 129.9 kB
  • After minification 129.9 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 993.6 kB
  • After minification 987.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kredit Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 116.1 kB
  • After minification 116.1 kB
  • After compression 28.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 89 (72%)

Requests Now

123

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 123 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kredit Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

kredit.vergleich.de accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

kredit.vergleich.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

kredit.vergleich.de SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kredit.vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kredit.vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kredit Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: