Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

value-at-risk.net

Value-at-Risk: Theory and Practice, Second Edition - by Glyn A. Holton

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

662 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

value-at-risk.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to value-at-risk.net homepage info - get ready to check Value At Risk best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about value-at-risk.net

The definitive book on value-at-risk (VaR) is out in a second edition distributed free online. Start reading now.

Visit value-at-risk.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Value-at-risk.net page load time and found that the first response time was 662 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

value-at-risk.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.value-at-risk.net

662 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

237 ms

footnote-voodoo.css

104 ms

style.css

154 ms

layout.css

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Value-at-risk.net, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) belongs to the original domain Value-at-risk.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 321.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

931.1 kB

After Optimization

609.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Value-at-risk.net main page is 931.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 480.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 96.4 kB

  • Original 118.8 kB
  • After minification 117.6 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 480.0 kB
  • After minification 469.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Value At Risk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 134.6 kB

  • Original 237.4 kB
  • After minification 232.7 kB
  • After compression 102.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.6 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 80.5 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Value-at-risk.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Value At Risk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

value-at-risk.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

value-at-risk.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

value-at-risk.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Value-at-risk.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Value-at-risk.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Value At Risk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: