10.9 sec in total
1.9 sec
7.8 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to vdeep.net homepage info - get ready to check Vdeep best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about vdeep.net
vdeepはプログラミング、IT、Web技術、ライフハックの事などなどを管理人okutaniがつぶやくブログです。
Visit vdeep.netWe analyzed Vdeep.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
vdeep.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.33
34/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
1925 ms
548 ms
920 ms
38 ms
356 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Vdeep.net, 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Vdeep.net.
Page size can be reduced by 259.0 kB (29%)
905.8 kB
646.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Vdeep.net main page is 905.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 592.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vdeep images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vdeep.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (55%)
73
33
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vdeep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vdeep.net
1925 ms
normalize.css
548 ms
style.css
920 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
sem-external-links.css
356 ms
styles.css
367 ms
screen.min.css
377 ms
wpp.css
533 ms
amazonjs.css
546 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
widgets.js
10 ms
plusone.js
68 ms
bookmark_button.js
321 ms
jquery.form.min.js
190 ms
scripts.js
548 ms
front.min.js
377 ms
jquery.sonar.min.js
185 ms
lazy-load.js
179 ms
wp-embed.min.js
355 ms
base.js
356 ms
scroll.js
366 ms
count.js
378 ms
style.css
768 ms
ga.js
62 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
406 ms
button-only.gif
176 ms
br.jpg
1457 ms
vdeep-top.jpg
750 ms
1x1.trans.gif
206 ms
search.png
203 ms
prof-oku-rare.jpg
1237 ms
2898-featured-120x120.png
783 ms
2621-featured-120x120.jpg
657 ms
2362-featured-120x120.png
976 ms
937-featured-120x120.jpg
984 ms
2780-featured-120x120.jpg
1098 ms
facebook.png
952 ms
twitter.png
1354 ms
rss.png
1351 ms
go-to-top.png
1936 ms
sdk.js
18 ms
vdeep-descr.jpg
1265 ms
vdeep-nav.jpg
1394 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
LogoTypeGothic.woff
4575 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
25 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
182 ms
like.php
452 ms
xd_arbiter.php
78 ms
xd_arbiter.php
93 ms
284 ms
count.js
254 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
186 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
209 ms
fastbutton
254 ms
wp-better-delete-revision-150x150.png
1279 ms
vimium-150x150.png
1260 ms
wp-series-func-150x150.jpeg
951 ms
gitignore-150x150.png
1359 ms
css-marker-150x150.jpeg
1127 ms
php-composer-150x150.png
1832 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
95 ms
reset.css
40 ms
entry-button.css
52 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
86 ms
postmessageRelay
108 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.ja.html
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
51 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
62 ms
vbutton-bg.png
38 ms
api.js
53 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
80 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
57 ms
jot
88 ms
vdeep.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vdeep.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vdeep.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vdeep.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vdeep.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vdeep.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vdeep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: