3.7 sec in total
290 ms
3.3 sec
198 ms
Welcome to vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about vergleich.de
Nehmen Sie Ihre Finanzen mit unseren Vergleichen und Ratgebern zu ✓Baufinanzierung ✓Kredit ✓Geldanlage ✓Strom & Gas ✓Handy & DSL selbst in die Hand
Visit vergleich.deWe analyzed Vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value3,490 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
290 ms
776 ms
134 ms
231 ms
524 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Vergleich.de, 9% (7 requests) were made to Dmp.theadex.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (776 ms) belongs to the original domain Vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 553.6 kB (59%)
935.2 kB
381.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Vergleich.de main page is 935.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 554.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 375.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 375.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (56%)
68
30
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vergleich.de
290 ms
www.vergleich.de
776 ms
head-c7d8d7c8f32d42537e07dff694429ea6.merged.css
134 ms
stylesheet_9af42d630b.css
231 ms
jquery-1.7.x-1.8.x-1.2.x.js
524 ms
head-ab06e7d2012b2ac3c48f146fa82001f4.merged.js
291 ms
tooltipp.js
285 ms
flowplayer.min.js
288 ms
nifty.js
286 ms
js.cookie.js
320 ms
cookie_usage_layer.js
377 ms
27698.min.js
21 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
vergleich.gif
130 ms
i.cid
415 ms
bt_send.gif
129 ms
spacer.gif
128 ms
i_gruen_dunkel_06.jpg
127 ms
vgl-de_bubble-94x54_2.png
128 ms
startseite-geldanlage_270x140.jpg
128 ms
btn_vergleichen-blau_24px.png
199 ms
startseite-baufinanzierung_270x140.jpg
198 ms
startseite-ratenkredit.jpg
201 ms
depotgebuehren_95x55.jpg
199 ms
newsletter_teaser_40x41.png
195 ms
bt_abonnieren_newsletter.gif
203 ms
zinswecker_teaser45x45.gif
293 ms
newsletter-teaser_95x55.jpg
293 ms
thumb_informationen_2_16.jpg
296 ms
clear.gif
295 ms
logo_gplus.gif
296 ms
logo_facebook.gif
297 ms
logo_twitter.gif
389 ms
logo_rss.gif
389 ms
logo_vglblog.gif
395 ms
fbevents.js
303 ms
header_icon.gif
364 ms
header_corners.gif
341 ms
header_corner_left.gif
346 ms
listenpfeil_weiss_auf_blau.gif
431 ms
hl_pfeil_blau.gif
429 ms
bg-rechner_155px.png
435 ms
haekchen_rot.gif
426 ms
buttonlink-arrow.png
430 ms
hl_pfeil_gruen.gif
432 ms
bg_newsletter_zinsupdate_streifen_410x30.png
515 ms
preload_ratenkredit_video.png
712 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
socialshareprivacy.css
509 ms
ajax-loading.gif
468 ms
dummy_facebook.png
471 ms
dummy_twitter.png
471 ms
dummy_gplus.png
557 ms
white.png
560 ms
603 ms
adex.js
451 ms
linkid.js
8 ms
ec.js
9 ms
collect
2 ms
collect
64 ms
15 ms
pixel
32 ms
pixel
20 ms
i.match
79 ms
t.js
88 ms
socialshareprivacy_on_off.png
98 ms
analytic.js
87 ms
172 ms
pixel
25 ms
generic
22 ms
generic
3 ms
cm.gif
89 ms
2.gif
186 ms
niftyCorners.css
98 ms
mastertag.kpcustomer.de
501 ms
1.gif
89 ms
vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
vergleich.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: