3.5 sec in total
231 ms
2.3 sec
966 ms
Click here to check amazing Versicherungsvergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about versicherungsvergleich.de
Versicherungsvergleich Krankenversicherung, Zusatzkrankenversicherung, Gebäudeversicherung + Bauherrenhaftpflicht + Hausratversicherung TOP
Visit versicherungsvergleich.deWe analyzed Versicherungsvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
versicherungsvergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.105
88/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
231 ms
536 ms
289 ms
399 ms
300 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Versicherungsvergleich.de, 11% (6 requests) were made to Cloud.ccm19.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) belongs to the original domain Versicherungsvergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 129.9 kB (3%)
4.0 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Versicherungsvergleich.de main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Versicherungsvergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Versicherungsvergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Versicherungsvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
versicherungsvergleich.de
231 ms
versicherungsvergleich.de
536 ms
jquery371.js
289 ms
bootstrap.min.css
399 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
300 ms
style.css
390 ms
style-headers.css
302 ms
style-colors.css
405 ms
font-awesome.min.css
386 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
384 ms
bootstrap.min.js
418 ms
settings.css
485 ms
extralayers.css
482 ms
js
58 ms
style.css
483 ms
countervgl.js
524 ms
app.js
613 ms
jquery1111.js
498 ms
scripts.js
498 ms
side_scripts.js
490 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
491 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
589 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
590 ms
app.css
97 ms
widget
203 ms
versicherungsvergleich.png
163 ms
vereinsversicherung_tipp_ohne.png
163 ms
gebaeudeversicherung.jpg
299 ms
kfz_haftpflicht.jpg
394 ms
kfzversicherung.png
163 ms
beruf_betriebshaftpflicht.jpg
396 ms
privathaftpflicht.jpg
480 ms
privatversicherungen.png
197 ms
pferdeversicherung.jpg
778 ms
pferdeversicherung.png
295 ms
vereinshaftpflicht.jpg
870 ms
vereinsversicherung.png
399 ms
rechtsschutzversicherung.jpg
496 ms
waldversicherung.jpg
786 ms
waldversicherung.png
502 ms
krankenversicherung.jpg
671 ms
check1.jpg
600 ms
makler.jpg
603 ms
telefon.png
698 ms
mobil.png
701 ms
fax.png
766 ms
whatsapp.png
795 ms
call.png
797 ms
email.png
863 ms
search.png
767 ms
footer.png
775 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
731 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
741 ms
settings-icon
152 ms
consent
249 ms
details
96 ms
versicherungsvergleich.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
versicherungsvergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
versicherungsvergleich.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
DE
![]()
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versicherungsvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Versicherungsvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versicherungsvergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Versicherungsvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: