8.6 sec in total
631 ms
7.7 sec
256 ms
Visit versicherungsvergleiche.de now to see the best up-to-date Versicherungsvergleich E content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about versicherungsvergleiche.de
Versicherungsvergleich 2023! ✅ Top Versicherung Vergleich! ✅ Versicherungs-Vergleich für viele Versicherungen! ✅
Visit versicherungsvergleiche.deWe analyzed Versicherungsvergleiche.de page load time and found that the first response time was 631 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
versicherungsvergleiche.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value2,360 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
631 ms
513 ms
44 ms
45 ms
717 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Versicherungsvergleiche.de, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Versicherungsvergleiche.de.
Page size can be reduced by 165.4 kB (16%)
1.0 MB
866.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Versicherungsvergleiche.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 887.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Versicherungsvergleich E images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)
19
16
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Versicherungsvergleich E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
versicherungsvergleiche.de
631 ms
b=css&f=normalize.css,bootstrap.min.css,style.css
513 ms
css
44 ms
jquery-2.1.1.js
45 ms
bootstrap.js
717 ms
script.js
247 ms
AC_Slider_Startseite_1.jpg
312 ms
AC_Slider_Haus_Heim_1.jpg
209 ms
AC_Slider_KFZ-Versicherung.jpg
598 ms
AC_Slider_Haftpflicht_Recht.jpg
338 ms
AC_Slider_Risiko_Vorsorge.jpg
742 ms
AC_Slider_Gesundheit.jpg
705 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_KFZ.jpg
517 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_Haftpflicht%20&%20Recht.jpg
621 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_Haus&Heim.jpg
634 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_Risiko&Vorsorge.jpg
827 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_Gesundheit.jpg
6672 ms
AC_Uebersicht_Versicherungen_Bilder_Firmen%20&%20Selbststaendige.jpg
829 ms
piwik.js
394 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
704 ms
versicherungsvergleiche.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
versicherungsvergleiche.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
versicherungsvergleiche.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versicherungsvergleiche.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Versicherungsvergleiche.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versicherungsvergleiche.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Versicherungsvergleich E. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: