3.4 sec in total
323 ms
2.9 sec
155 ms
Visit versita.com now to see the best up-to-date Versita content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about versita.com
Visit versita.comWe analyzed Versita.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
versita.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
323 ms
718 ms
421 ms
256 ms
603 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Versita.com, 90% (35 requests) were made to Degruyteropen.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Degruyteropen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 732.0 kB (66%)
1.1 MB
378.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Versita.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 770.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Versita needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 590.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 590.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Versita.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (54%)
35
16
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Versita. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
versita.com
323 ms
degruyteropen.com
718 ms
jquery-ui.css
421 ms
jqtransform.css
256 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
603 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js
172 ms
jquery.jqtransform.js
344 ms
jQuery.BlackAndWhite.min.js
252 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
428 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
337 ms
jquery-ui.js
1032 ms
script.js
422 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
613 ms
jquery.js
595 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
434 ms
pagination.js
436 ms
more_people.js
519 ms
publications_order_columns.js
535 ms
external-tracking.min.js
606 ms
navigation.js
523 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
88 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
bg.png
85 ms
logo.png
89 ms
social-iko.png
86 ms
search.png
88 ms
index-content.png
88 ms
left-col.png
148 ms
box-1.png
169 ms
arrow-box-left.png
171 ms
arrow-box-right.png
172 ms
Andy-Davis-June-2014-226x247.jpg
177 ms
mark_cov_s20819927-226x302.png
346 ms
logo2.png
234 ms
logo1.png
253 ms
gotham-bold-webfont.woff
229 ms
sourcesanspro-extralight-webfont.woff
232 ms
collect
12 ms
versita.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
versita.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
versita.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versita.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Versita.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versita.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Versita. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: