Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

vicul.net

vicul.net

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

957 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

481 ms

vicul.net screenshot

About Website

Visit vicul.net now to see the best up-to-date Vicul content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vicul.net

話題のニュースを毎日お届けしています。

Visit vicul.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Vicul.net page load time and found that the first response time was 957 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vicul.net performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vicul.net

957 ms

css

25 ms

font-awesome.min.css

513 ms

style.css

345 ms

862f32a206f3cef4363ebf2fd227b93e.css

362 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Vicul.net, 19% (15 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 250.4 kB (25%)

Content Size

990.2 kB

After Optimization

739.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Vicul.net main page is 990.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 570.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 570.6 kB
  • After minification 561.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vicul images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 129.6 kB

  • Original 267.2 kB
  • After minification 264.3 kB
  • After compression 137.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 73.2 kB

  • Original 92.8 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vicul.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (32%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vicul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vicul.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

vicul.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

vicul.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vicul.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Japanese. Our system also found out that Vicul.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vicul. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: