Tools & Wizards About Us
vidalife.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 95% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

vidalife.info

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

836 ms

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

vidalife.info screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vidalife.info homepage info - get ready to check Vidalife best content right away, or after learning these important things about vidalife.info

Solve business problems with no-code and low-code solutions and inspect the future of no-code, low-code development.

Visit vidalife.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Vidalife.info page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vidalife.info performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,940 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

how-no-code-low-code-can-solve-the-problems-of-your-business

213 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

96 ms

icons.svg

116 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

141 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Vidalife.info, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.appmaster.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (561 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.appmaster.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 375.7 kB (75%)

Content Size

497.8 kB

After Optimization

122.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Vidalife.info main page is 497.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 455.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 375.7 kB

  • Original 455.8 kB
  • After minification 449.3 kB
  • After compression 80.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 375.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vidalife images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (55%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidalife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

how-no-code-low-code-can-solve-the-problems-of-your-business

how-no-code-low-code-can-solve-the-problems-of-your-business

213 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

logo_full.2779212.svg

96 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

116 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

header-course.3aaea7e.png

141 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

110 ms

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

153 ms

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

155 ms

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

163 ms

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

141 ms

376 ms

145cedd.js

145cedd.js

105 ms

ed7b270.js

ed7b270.js

108 ms

eebe551.js

eebe551.js

123 ms

ee0f0bb.js

ee0f0bb.js

120 ms

a6512ae.js

a6512ae.js

108 ms

019cae2.js

019cae2.js

118 ms

3935252.js

3935252.js

121 ms

d7a7cdc.js

d7a7cdc.js

128 ms

04c5534.js

04c5534.js

217 ms

ca31d53.js

ca31d53.js

221 ms

24076c4.js

24076c4.js

215 ms

1fd973f.js

1fd973f.js

218 ms

7c86bb1.js

7c86bb1.js

219 ms

3ac0b93.js

3ac0b93.js

224 ms

4e65854.js

4e65854.js

223 ms

b48a3db.js

b48a3db.js

229 ms

aa03654.js

aa03654.js

223 ms

8cb65fc.js

8cb65fc.js

231 ms

ff6a6a1.js

ff6a6a1.js

234 ms

42e6624.js

42e6624.js

240 ms

b738747.js

b738747.js

241 ms

566e4a1.js

566e4a1.js

240 ms

e34de54.js

e34de54.js

238 ms

dcd41e7.js

dcd41e7.js

253 ms

963cc3a.js

963cc3a.js

247 ms

9e8ee83.js

9e8ee83.js

247 ms

49d5b06.js

49d5b06.js

248 ms

561 ms

0d1a26d.js

0d1a26d.js

259 ms

check-icon.svg

check-icon.svg

228 ms

279 ms

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

188 ms

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

193 ms

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

186 ms

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

216 ms

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

217 ms

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

207 ms

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

206 ms

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

213 ms

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

224 ms

Accessibility Review

vidalife.info accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vidalife.info best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vidalife.info SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidalife.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vidalife.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vidalife.info

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vidalife. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: