3 sec in total
169 ms
2.6 sec
280 ms
Visit videk.com now to see the best up-to-date Videk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videk.com
Videk is a global provider of automated vision-based print verification systems, inserter input and output scanning systems, barcode scanning technology, data management software and professional serv...
Visit videk.comWe analyzed Videk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
videk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.771
5/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
169 ms
223 ms
165 ms
454 ms
216 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Videk.com, 74% (29 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 507.0 kB (75%)
672.8 kB
165.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Videk.com main page is 672.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 526.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 422.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 422.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Videk needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 83% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)
23
13
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.videk.com
169 ms
minified.js
223 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
165 ms
polyfill.min.js
454 ms
bootstrap-features.08dd9a91.bundle.min.js
216 ms
main.c5638ec5.bundle.min.js
448 ms
lodash.min.js
203 ms
react.production.min.js
202 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
544 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
541 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
542 ms
Videk-Logo_color2_edited.png
1395 ms
thunderbolt
1292 ms
5929708d78b3429da0e3f5ce0036c008.jpg
1410 ms
ColorStream%20Embedded%20CIS%20while%20running.jpg
1649 ms
11062b_6694be830cd1452ba1d012dc3593e29e~mv2.jpg
1515 ms
Videk-Logo_color2.png
1501 ms
ironpatern.6522082f.png
727 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
108 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
111 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
111 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
112 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
109 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
109 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
120 ms
AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff
128 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
124 ms
192dac76-a6d9-413d-bb74-22308f2e0cc5.woff
126 ms
0a3939d0-3833-4db3-8b85-f64c2b3350d2.woff
125 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
127 ms
80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff
127 ms
LuloCleanW05-OneBold.woff
127 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
138 ms
thunderbolt
122 ms
elementory-browser-support.min.js
131 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
27 ms
bolt-performance
25 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
videk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
videk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
videk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Videk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: