Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

vigilante.us

Home - Vigilante

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

361 ms

vigilante.us screenshot

About Website

Visit vigilante.us now to see the best up-to-date Vigilante content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vigilante.us

Visit vigilante.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Vigilante.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vigilante.us performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,220 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vigilante.us

1670 ms

ooohboi-steroids.js

191 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

267 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

236 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Vigilante.us, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Vigilante.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 543.1 kB (78%)

Content Size

692.4 kB

After Optimization

149.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Vigilante.us main page is 692.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 623.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 535.0 kB

  • Original 623.6 kB
  • After minification 622.9 kB
  • After compression 88.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 535.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 68.7 kB
  • After minification 68.7 kB
  • After compression 60.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (97%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vigilante. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vigilante.us accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vigilante.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vigilante.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vigilante.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vigilante.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vigilante. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: