1.5 sec in total
159 ms
969 ms
327 ms
Visit village.photos now to see the best up-to-date Village content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about village.photos
Photo hosting - share, manage and publish photos, set up private and password protected albums. Free accounts and custom websites in minutes.
Visit village.photosWe analyzed Village.photos page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
village.photos performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value4,310 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
159 ms
21 ms
135 ms
6 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Village.photos, 33% (13 requests) were made to S1.village.photos and 20% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) relates to the external source S1.village.photos.
Page size can be reduced by 110.2 kB (13%)
854.2 kB
744.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Village.photos main page is 854.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 751.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Village images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Village.photos needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (44%)
36
20
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Village. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
village.photos
159 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
21 ms
master.css
135 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
6 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
31 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
82 ms
global.js
121 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
120 ms
platform.js
66 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
sdk.js
192 ms
whcc.png
59 ms
resized_032f412e-4183-40f8-991e-92eb616be152.jpg
656 ms
bc4c9129.jpg
451 ms
narrow.jpg
141 ms
narrow-dark.jpg
180 ms
narrow-light.jpg
194 ms
facebook2.png
140 ms
google-plus-icon-png-transparent.png
188 ms
burger.png
180 ms
spinner.gif
231 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
15 ms
sharebutton
65 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
ec.js
34 ms
postmessageRelay
88 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
102 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
24 ms
rs=AGLTcCNEeBXwi31Sa43CyaFD4uWCwotgXw
23 ms
vxNK-E6B13CyehuDCmvQvw.woff
83 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
90 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
46 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
46 ms
ga-audiences
45 ms
127 ms
xd_arbiter.php
131 ms
xd_arbiter.php
264 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
village.photos accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
village.photos best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
village.photos SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Village.photos can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Village.photos main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
village.photos
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Village. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: