4.7 sec in total
353 ms
4.1 sec
264 ms
Click here to check amazing Visiplex content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about visiplex.com
Wireless paging systems, 2-way intercom, emergency notification, break bell & synchronized clock systems for schools & commercial applications
Visit visiplex.comWe analyzed Visiplex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
visiplex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
353 ms
123 ms
128 ms
137 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Visiplex.com, 67% (60 requests) were made to Cdn.visiplex.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.livechatinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (68%)
3.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Visiplex.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 990 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visiplex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 745.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visiplex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 745.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (66%)
76
26
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visiplex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.visiplex.com
353 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
layout.css
128 ms
prettyPhoto.css
137 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
134 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
135 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
132 ms
colorbox.css
135 ms
minimalist.css
10 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate.css
136 ms
wp_lightbox_ultimate_custom.css
137 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
137 ms
font-awesome.css
160 ms
ilightbox.css
154 ms
animations.css
156 ms
woocommerce.css
156 ms
avada-6.css
165 ms
masterslider.main.css
161 ms
custom.css
172 ms
jquery.js
172 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
189 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
170 ms
wplu_prettyPhoto.js
191 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
191 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
193 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
195 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
195 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
195 ms
colorbox.js
197 ms
flowplayer.min.js
7 ms
core.min.js
195 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
195 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
239 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
239 ms
woocommerce.min.js
238 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
239 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
239 ms
main.min.js
204 ms
angelleye-frontend.js
205 ms
wp-embed.min.js
205 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
120 ms
masterslider.min.js
117 ms
analytics.js
59 ms
visiplex_logo2_sm1.png
39 ms
blank.gif
38 ms
amazon1.jpg
38 ms
google1.jpg
39 ms
uofi1.jpg
39 ms
pepsico1.png
40 ms
lv11.jpg
41 ms
kraftfoods1.png
40 ms
federalreserve1.png
41 ms
hyatt1.png
42 ms
csx1.jpg
42 ms
atlantis1.png
43 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
26 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
38 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
26 ms
icomoon.woff
25 ms
RzoNiRR1p2Mqyyz2RwqSMw.woff
26 ms
AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
25 ms
yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2j8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
26 ms
tracking.js
532 ms
collect
16 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
12 ms
gtm.js
309 ms
fbds.js
518 ms
collect
508 ms
loading-2.gif
261 ms
css
455 ms
overlay.png
210 ms
school.jpg
210 ms
fbevents.js
47 ms
ga-audiences
61 ms
script_data.js
79 ms
28 ms
11 ms
college_campus.jpg
4 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_be3cff16bb2d89275902ef2f724e4e74.js
42 ms
ping
98 ms
open_chat.cgi
84 ms
livechat-classic_f726105e9a.ttf
29 ms
industrial.jpg
5 ms
embedded.20160318100705.js
110 ms
hospital.jpg
3 ms
assisted_living.jpg
4 ms
commercial.jpg
8 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
6 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
5 ms
visiplex.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
visiplex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
visiplex.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visiplex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visiplex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
visiplex.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Visiplex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: