Access visiting.ru. Продвижение и заработок в социальных сетях | SММ

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.381

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

visiting.ru

433 ms

visiting.ru

1151 ms

cashbox.ru

840 ms

bootstrap.min.css

110 ms

font-awesome.min.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Visiting.ru, 77% (70 requests) were made to Cashbox.ru and 4% (4 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cashbox.ru.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Visiting.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 826.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

Original 75.1 kB
After minification 55.6 kB
After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 115.7 kB

Original 826.2 kB
After minification 710.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Visiting needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

Original 439.8 kB
After minification 439.8 kB
After compression 400.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

Original 72.2 kB
After minification 72.2 kB
After compression 69.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visiting.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visiting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visiting.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Visiting.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

visiting.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visiting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Продвижение и заработок в социальных сетях | SММ | Продвижение мобильных приложений

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

visiting.ru

visiting.ru

cashbox.ru

bootstrap.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

visiting.ru

visiting.ru

cashbox.ru

bootstrap.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

ionicons.min.css

AdminLTE.min.css

skin-blue.min.css

cashbox_fonts.css

cashbox_styles.css

cashbox_responsive-styles.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

languages.css

addcss.css

api.js

illicium_loginless_0_3.js

jquery-2.2.3.min.js

jquery.json-2.3.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

addjs.js

jquery.jgrowl_minimized.js

bootstrap-slider.js

cashbox_js.js

jquery.validate.min.js

ru

ru

recaptcha__en.js

css

analytics.js

tag.js

code.js

logo.png

languages.png

illustration_firstScreen.png

clouds.png

worker1.png

worker2.png

worker3.png

icon1.png

icon2.png

icon3.png

icon4.png

icon5.png