Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

visitstockton.org

Welcome to the city of Stockton, California | Visit Stockton

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

9.9 sec

Page Rendered

578 ms

visitstockton.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to visitstockton.org homepage info - get ready to check Visit Stockton best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about visitstockton.org

A flavorful Northern California getaway celebrating the essence of California’s Central Valley. Explore the most culturally rich and diverse city in San

Visit visitstockton.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Visitstockton.org page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visitstockton.org performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value22,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visitstockton.org

177 ms

www.visitstockton.org

4383 ms

styles.css

134 ms

head.js

133 ms

addthis_widget.js

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Visitstockton.org, 16% (28 requests) were made to Visit-stockton.s3.amazonaws.com and 3% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Visitstockton.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (39%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Visitstockton.org main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 186.3 kB

  • Original 234.5 kB
  • After minification 217.0 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 73.0 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visit Stockton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 684.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 72.1 kB

  • Original 88.5 kB
  • After minification 88.1 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visitstockton.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (35%)

Requests Now

149

After Optimization

97

The browser has sent 149 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visit Stockton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

visitstockton.org accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

visitstockton.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

visitstockton.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visitstockton.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Visitstockton.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visit Stockton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: