Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

vitalbody.co

VitalBody Home

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

vitalbody.co screenshot

About Website

Visit vitalbody.co now to see the best up-to-date Vital Body content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vitalbody.co

EMPOWERING THE BODY THROUGH NATURE Whole Food Plant-Based Nutrition For Everyone Get Yours CUSTOMER FAVORITES CORE NUTRITIONVFV - Vital Fruits & Vegetables     > COLLAGENCTR - Connective Tissue Repair...

Visit vitalbody.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitalbody.co page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitalbody.co performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,500 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.355

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitalbody.co

12 ms

www.vitalbody.com

123 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

alurablocks-style.css

92 ms

style.min.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 202 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vitalbody.co, 77% (156 requests) were made to D3h41a3vo0vrpc.cloudfront.net and 6% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source D3h41a3vo0vrpc.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.6 kB (46%)

Content Size

321.9 kB

After Optimization

172.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Vitalbody.co main page is 321.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 244.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 148.2 kB

  • Original 244.8 kB
  • After minification 96.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vital Body needs image optimization as it can save up to 148.2 kB or 61% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 76 B

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 4.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 73.0 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 71.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitalbody.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 154 (83%)

Requests Now

185

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 185 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vital Body. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 91 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 65 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vitalbody.co accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vitalbody.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vitalbody.co SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitalbody.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vitalbody.co main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vital Body. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: