Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

viva.ua

Віва - журнал про шоу бізнес і зірок України та світу | viva.ua

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

561 ms

viva.ua screenshot

About Website

Visit viva.ua now to see the best up-to-date Viva content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about viva.ua

Журнал Віва - це останні та найсвіжіші новини про світ шоу-бізнесу, зірок і знаменитостей України | Ексклюзивні та найцікавіші статті про шоу біз | Viva

Visit viva.ua

Key Findings

We analyzed Viva.ua page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

viva.ua performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,490 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

viva.ua

456 ms

viva.ua

1024 ms

core.js

298 ms

adsbygoogle.js

125 ms

0slBQMI6bOy8

535 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Viva.ua, 10% (8 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Viva.ua.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 361.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Viva.ua main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 926.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 154.1 kB

  • Original 199.6 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB
  • After compression 45.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 35.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 119.7 kB

  • Original 926.3 kB
  • After minification 806.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Viva needs image optimization as it can save up to 119.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 83.5 kB

  • Original 466.0 kB
  • After minification 466.0 kB
  • After compression 382.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 38.5 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viva.ua has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (40%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

viva.ua accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

viva.ua best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

viva.ua SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    UK

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viva.ua can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Ukrainian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Viva.ua main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: