7.5 sec in total
477 ms
6.7 sec
289 ms
Click here to check amazing Viva Communication content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivacommunication.com
Viva Communications
Visit vivacommunication.comWe analyzed Vivacommunication.com page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
vivacommunication.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.218
57/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
477 ms
953 ms
238 ms
758 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Vivacommunication.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Vivacommunication.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.3 kB (6%)
3.6 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Vivacommunication.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.8 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viva Communication images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivacommunication.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)
81
36
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viva Communication. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivacommunication.com
477 ms
953 ms
index
238 ms
index.php
758 ms
bootstrap.min.css
241 ms
font-awesome.min.css
477 ms
owl.carousel.css
679 ms
owl.theme.css
684 ms
video.min.css
688 ms
animate.css
692 ms
font-monia.css
702 ms
settings.css
714 ms
layers.css
906 ms
navigation.css
912 ms
style.css
1145 ms
template.css
1159 ms
responsive.css
936 ms
space.css
951 ms
js
75 ms
api.js
38 ms
captcha.css
1132 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
17 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
1370 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1171 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1202 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1369 ms
waypoints.min.js
1387 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1390 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1404 ms
wow.min.js
1443 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1813 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1598 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
1600 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
1619 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
1638 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
1662 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
1828 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
1828 ms
script.js
1849 ms
demo.css
1913 ms
intlTelInput.css
1913 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
2038 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
2056 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
1818 ms
callback.js
1608 ms
css
30 ms
fbevents.js
88 ms
insight.min.js
88 ms
callbutton.png
976 ms
heart.gif
966 ms
logo1.png
966 ms
homeviva_new.jpg
1311 ms
homeviva_new_mobile.jpg
1333 ms
Cloud%20Telephony.png
1108 ms
read_more.png
1133 ms
Cloud%20Contact%20Center%20Solutions.png
1394 ms
SD-WAN.png
1193 ms
whatsapp-transparent-12.png
1338 ms
icon1.png
1364 ms
icon2.png
1429 ms
icon3.png
1538 ms
Press-release.jpeg
1788 ms
sc4.jpg
2250 ms
recaptcha__de.js
96 ms
case-study.png
2471 ms
font
76 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
147 ms
fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff
1674 ms
moniad046.ttf
2635 ms
case-study-a.jpg
2010 ms
case-study-b.jpeg
2034 ms
Press-release-a.jpeg
2071 ms
White%20paper%20a.png
2635 ms
White%20paper.png
2282 ms
White%20paper%20b.png
2291 ms
vilogo3.png
2126 ms
poly.jpg
2290 ms
line-left-dark.png
2319 ms
line-right-dark.png
2300 ms
left-arrow.png
2212 ms
right-arrow.png
2254 ms
whats_left.png
2302 ms
whats_right.png
2342 ms
fallback
24 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
css
17 ms
logo_48.png
4 ms
font
4 ms
vivacommunication.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
vivacommunication.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
vivacommunication.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
ZX
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivacommunication.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivacommunication.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivacommunication.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viva Communication. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: