Tools & Wizards About Us
vivalink.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

vivalink.com

Digital Health Technologies for Remote Patient Monitoring

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

873 ms

vivalink.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vivalink content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivalink.com

Remote patient monitoring technologies and services with innovative wearables and edge-to-cloud data services for healthcare and clinical trials

Visit vivalink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivalink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivalink.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.011

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.vivalink.com

115 ms

jquery-1.11.2.js

51 ms

module_40756637546_Act21_Hero_Slider.min.css

49 ms

all.min.css

24 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Vivalink.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to F.hubspotusercontent20.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Vivalink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 178.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vivalink.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 161.9 kB

  • Original 181.4 kB
  • After minification 165.1 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivalink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 158.1 kB
  • After minification 158.1 kB
  • After compression 151.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 52.8 kB
  • After minification 52.8 kB
  • After compression 43.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivalink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivalink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.vivalink.com

www.vivalink.com

115 ms

jquery-1.11.2.js

jquery-1.11.2.js

51 ms

module_40756637546_Act21_Hero_Slider.min.css

module_40756637546_Act21_Hero_Slider.min.css

49 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

24 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

33 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

43 ms

Act21.css

Act21.css

46 ms

current.js

current.js

41 ms

embed.js

embed.js

29 ms

custom-script.min.js

custom-script.min.js

56 ms

project.js

project.js

69 ms

project.js

project.js

157 ms

v2.js

v2.js

79 ms

act21.min.js

act21.min.js

68 ms

4301021.js

4301021.js

486 ms

index.js

index.js

75 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

19 ms

hotjar-2441979.js

hotjar-2441979.js

448 ms

css

css

43 ms

latest.css

latest.css

45 ms

act21.updates.min.css

act21.updates.min.css

42 ms

7299b7d5-b5f6-41f2-9aa3-3bff2de9825f.png

7299b7d5-b5f6-41f2-9aa3-3bff2de9825f.png

433 ms

Vivalink-logo-white.svg

Vivalink-logo-white.svg

102 ms

bottom-shadow5.png

bottom-shadow5.png

400 ms

80e012df-34ce-48a0-823a-a11ef6586775.png

80e012df-34ce-48a0-823a-a11ef6586775.png

358 ms

9b464938-cc86-4827-b04c-0b7c9e5f1678.png

9b464938-cc86-4827-b04c-0b7c9e5f1678.png

538 ms

7015ecd6-399c-4bb2-bc5e-81c4f5520d74.png

7015ecd6-399c-4bb2-bc5e-81c4f5520d74.png

537 ms

71eab2d5-34b9-45d7-98e5-209c8ab57535.png

71eab2d5-34b9-45d7-98e5-209c8ab57535.png

541 ms

231df243-fcc9-43f8-a184-0c583b51ffcc.png

231df243-fcc9-43f8-a184-0c583b51ffcc.png

448 ms

458314e7-ed1d-46f1-afea-fdfa3281aaa5.png

458314e7-ed1d-46f1-afea-fdfa3281aaa5.png

537 ms

5879b8db-6193-44aa-b302-f463a881d5db.png

5879b8db-6193-44aa-b302-f463a881d5db.png

404 ms

00c36fe7-e00b-4b7e-9f94-91f355830249.png

00c36fe7-e00b-4b7e-9f94-91f355830249.png

538 ms

Acute%20RPM%20Transparent.png

Acute%20RPM%20Transparent.png

539 ms

Data%20support%20shutterstock_740740963.jpg

Data%20support%20shutterstock_740740963.jpg

359 ms

Cardiac%20Monitoring%20Transparent.png

Cardiac%20Monitoring%20Transparent.png

537 ms

vivalink-connection.png

vivalink-connection.png

357 ms

chemotherapy-rpm.jpg

chemotherapy-rpm.jpg

357 ms

vitals-data-1.jpg

vitals-data-1.jpg

356 ms

data.jpg

data.jpg

403 ms

heartbeat-1.png

heartbeat-1.png

403 ms

lungs-1.png

lungs-1.png

608 ms

temperature-1.png

temperature-1.png

535 ms

SpO2.png

SpO2.png

537 ms

blood-pressure-1.png

blood-pressure-1.png

536 ms

ucsf.png

ucsf.png

551 ms

bioclinica.png

bioclinica.png

552 ms

current-health.png

current-health.png

551 ms

FDA_21CFR11.png

FDA_21CFR11.png

552 ms

CE-logo.png

CE-logo.png

551 ms

NMPA.jpg

NMPA.jpg

612 ms

hippa_compliance_logo.png

hippa_compliance_logo.png

609 ms

gdpr_logo.png

gdpr_logo.png

608 ms

Vanta-1.png

Vanta-1.png

607 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

482 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

541 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

601 ms

Platform%20Award%202.jpg

Platform%20Award%202.jpg

274 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

102 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

59 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

102 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

34 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

101 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

56 ms

4301021.js

4301021.js

265 ms

fb.js

fb.js

207 ms

4301021.js

4301021.js

266 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

205 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

61 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

61 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

61 ms

fa-solid-900.svg

fa-solid-900.svg

11 ms

fa-regular-400.svg

fa-regular-400.svg

12 ms

fa-brands-400.svg

fa-brands-400.svg

12 ms

Accessibility Review

vivalink.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vivalink.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vivalink.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivalink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivalink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vivalink.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivalink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: