Tools & Wizards About Us
vivatclub.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

vivatclub.ru

Домен продается. Купить в магазине доменов Руцентр

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

815 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

vivatclub.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vivatclub content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivatclub.ru

Узнать подробнее о домене в магазине доменов Руцентр.

Visit vivatclub.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivatclub.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 815 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivatclub.ru performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.42

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vivatclub.ru

815 ms

core.css

380 ms

style.css

253 ms

style.css

254 ms

style.css

283 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Vivatclub.ru, 19% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vivatclub.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533.1 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

712.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vivatclub.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 625.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 504.6 kB
  • After minification 499.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivatclub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 436.2 kB

  • Original 625.3 kB
  • After minification 541.3 kB
  • After compression 189.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 436.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 52.3 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivatclub.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (51%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivatclub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vivatclub.ru

vivatclub.ru

815 ms

core.css

core.css

380 ms

style.css

style.css

253 ms

style.css

style.css

254 ms

style.css

style.css

283 ms

style.css

style.css

259 ms

styles.css

styles.css

375 ms

template_styles.css

template_styles.css

556 ms

core.js

core.js

967 ms

core_ajax.js

core_ajax.js

597 ms

session.js

session.js

292 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

637 ms

jquery.tmpl.js

jquery.tmpl.js

382 ms

less.js

less.js

704 ms

main.js

main.js

510 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

587 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

2044 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

2037 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

386 ms

hit

hit

264 ms

bg1.gif

bg1.gif

134 ms

title1.gif

title1.gif

134 ms

menu_bg.gif

menu_bg.gif

266 ms

separate1.gif

separate1.gif

134 ms

title2.gif

title2.gif

133 ms

separate2.gif

separate2.gif

134 ms

logo.png

logo.png

255 ms

shadow_bg.png

shadow_bg.png

250 ms

pointers1.png

pointers1.png

257 ms

zal.jpg

zal.jpg

396 ms

pool.jpg

pool.jpg

648 ms

salon.jpg

salon.jpg

626 ms

salon2.jpg

salon2.jpg

511 ms

pointers2.png

pointers2.png

385 ms

banner1.png

banner1.png

566 ms

banner2a.png

banner2a.png

1021 ms

banner3.png

banner3.png

529 ms

logo1.gif

logo1.gif

637 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

144 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

35 ms

widget_community.php

widget_community.php

308 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

633 ms

icons.gif

icons.gif

666 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

28 ms

watch.js

watch.js

24 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

207 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

61 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

80 ms

hit

hit

136 ms

loader_nav19239_3.js

loader_nav19239_3.js

138 ms

lite.css

lite.css

133 ms

lite.js

lite.js

505 ms

lang3_0.js

lang3_0.js

265 ms

widget_community.css

widget_community.css

266 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

267 ms

al_community.js

al_community.js

267 ms

36Idqcw0cJM.jpg

36Idqcw0cJM.jpg

391 ms

HRjnOD5swX4.jpg

HRjnOD5swX4.jpg

424 ms

x0QlKOijULE.jpg

x0QlKOijULE.jpg

262 ms

aEyz7qFX4ck.jpg

aEyz7qFX4ck.jpg

265 ms

h36PKzvgF2U.jpg

h36PKzvgF2U.jpg

386 ms

camera_50.png

camera_50.png

145 ms

w_logo.png

w_logo.png

128 ms

Accessibility Review

vivatclub.ru accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vivatclub.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

vivatclub.ru SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivatclub.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vivatclub.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vivatclub.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vivatclub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: