Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

vivedconsulting.com

College Admissions Consultants | College Application Programs

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

296 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

vivedconsulting.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vivedconsulting.com now to see the best up-to-date Vivedconsulting content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vivedconsulting.com

Our college admissions consultants works beside students and their parents to maximize their acceptance to their dream school.

Visit vivedconsulting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivedconsulting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 296 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivedconsulting.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.402

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ivyinsight.com

296 ms

4c02593b7aad568f938b6debfc97ba3e.css

211 ms

lazyload.min.js

63 ms

iig_flclr_cmyk-1-2-e1629773451111.png

289 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Vivedconsulting.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Ivyinsight.com and 15% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (754 ms) relates to the external source Ivyinsight.wpengine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 297.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Vivedconsulting.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 581.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 285.8 kB

  • Original 347.0 kB
  • After minification 341.7 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 285.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 581.8 kB
  • After minification 578.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivedconsulting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 297.0 kB
  • After minification 297.0 kB
  • After compression 292.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 234.1 kB
  • After minification 234.1 kB
  • After compression 230.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivedconsulting.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (35%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivedconsulting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vivedconsulting.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vivedconsulting.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vivedconsulting.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivedconsulting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivedconsulting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivedconsulting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: