7.5 sec in total
567 ms
6.6 sec
281 ms
Click here to check amazing Voldom 35 content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about voldom35.ru
Наша основная деятельность состоит в малоэтажном строительстве из дерева, в том числе строительстве домов в Вологде, производстве и продаже пиломатериалов.
Visit voldom35.ruWe analyzed Voldom35.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 567 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
voldom35.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value34.1 s
0/100
10%
Value7,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.691
7/100
15%
Value43.0 s
0/100
10%
567 ms
1420 ms
139 ms
279 ms
416 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Voldom35.ru, 7% (7 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Voldom35.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 403.8 kB (9%)
4.3 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Voldom35.ru main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Voldom 35 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 124.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Voldom35.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.5 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (78%)
91
20
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Voldom 35. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
voldom35.ru
567 ms
voldom35.ru
1420 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
139 ms
style.min.css
279 ms
lptw-recent-posts.css
416 ms
front_end_style.css
417 ms
dashicons.min.css
556 ms
desktop_style.css
424 ms
dnd-upload-cf7.css
425 ms
styles.css
425 ms
rs6.css
556 ms
to-top-public.css
552 ms
simple-lightbox.css
566 ms
pagenavi-css.css
565 ms
css
36 ms
css
53 ms
prettyPhoto.css
566 ms
style.css
833 ms
default.css
690 ms
pum-site-styles.css
693 ms
jquery.min.js
851 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
706 ms
rbtools.min.js
998 ms
rs6.min.js
978 ms
to-top-public.js
830 ms
ajax.min.js
848 ms
jquery-1.11.1.js
30 ms
jquery.cookie.js
31 ms
jquery.js
1262 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
972 ms
rbtools.min.js
1286 ms
rs6.min.js
1151 ms
688 ms
889 ms
owl.carousel.css
1108 ms
owl.theme.css
1112 ms
owl.transitions.css
1135 ms
lcs-styles.css
1246 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1251 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1283 ms
masonry.min.js
1297 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1383 ms
lptw-recent-posts.js
1388 ms
index.js
1397 ms
index.js
1289 ms
codedropz-uploader-min.js
1149 ms
common.js
1025 ms
lightbox_context.js
1113 ms
simple-lightbox.js
1114 ms
nextgen_simple_lightbox_init.js
1118 ms
underscore.min.js
1144 ms
openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js
256 ms
main.js
1024 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1027 ms
core.min.js
1108 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
1113 ms
owl.carousel.js
1119 ms
css
18 ms
2.jpg
1134 ms
3.jpg
863 ms
4.jpg
865 ms
5.jpg
1788 ms
6.jpg
816 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
58 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
60 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
36 ms
upload.gif
128 ms
widget_community.php
299 ms
final_logo_white.png
439 ms
loader_nav2109841103_3.js
298 ms
fonts_cnt.c7a76efe.css
1065 ms
lite.93f44416.css
786 ms
lang3_2.js
671 ms
c3d11fba.475e3ac7.js
639 ms
xdm.js
658 ms
base.ec2ae8ae.css
692 ms
tag.js
1058 ms
604 ms
793 ms
loader.gif
198 ms
lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js
304 ms
b0ce7b4fc73757225c37.css
547 ms
191 ms
16f718a5df062c278d03.yandex.ru.js
758 ms
8a21069879ba606bf29e.yandex.ru.js
821 ms
267 ms
browsers.png
99 ms
upload.gif
86 ms
code.js
838 ms
advert.gif
559 ms
watch.js
11 ms
full-e375679eab0e00a5e81ddbb027f673d8841bde2c.js
1688 ms
logo-web-ru-80x40.svg
319 ms
1
140 ms
counter
143 ms
dyn-goal-config.js
284 ms
tracker
143 ms
voldom35.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
voldom35.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
voldom35.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Voldom35.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Voldom35.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
voldom35.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Voldom 35. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: