Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

avideditor.wordpress.com

Avid Editor's Insights

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

7 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

avideditor.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit avideditor.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Avid Editor Wordpress content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about avideditor.wordpress.com

Visit avideditor.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Avideditor.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

avideditor.wordpress.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,040 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.13

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

avideditor.wordpress.com

7 ms

avideditor.wordpress.com

264 ms

style.css

73 ms

blue2.css

81 ms

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Avideditor.wordpress.com, 20% (18 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 17% (15 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.5 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

844.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Avideditor.wordpress.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 361.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 241.7 kB

  • Original 293.8 kB
  • After minification 289.8 kB
  • After compression 52.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 313.8 kB
  • After minification 300.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Avid Editor Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 361.0 kB
  • After minification 361.0 kB
  • After compression 355.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 177 B

  • Original 136.6 kB
  • After minification 136.6 kB
  • After compression 136.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Avideditor.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (37%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Avid Editor Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

avideditor.wordpress.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

avideditor.wordpress.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

avideditor.wordpress.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Avideditor.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Avideditor.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Avid Editor Wordpress. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: