Tools & Wizards About Us
balancer.webeye.hu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    35% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

balancer.webeye.hu

WebEye | Complete telematics solutions from one provider

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

537 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

185 ms

balancer.webeye.hu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to balancer.webeye.hu homepage info - get ready to check Balancer Web Eye best content for Hungary right away, or after learning these important things about balancer.webeye.hu

We help our customers to organize their logistics processes more efficiently, cut operational costs and manage their workforce more economically.

Visit balancer.webeye.hu

Key Findings

We analyzed Balancer.webeye.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

balancer.webeye.hu performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,090 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

balancer.webeye.hu

537 ms

normalize.css

239 ms

main.css

346 ms

jquery-ui.css

18 ms

jquery.mobile-1.2.0.min.css

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Balancer.webeye.hu, 11% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (774 ms) belongs to the original domain Balancer.webeye.hu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.6 kB (27%)

Content Size

504.7 kB

After Optimization

370.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Balancer.webeye.hu main page is 504.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 371.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 23.2 kB
  • After minification 19.9 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

  • Original 371.5 kB
  • After minification 292.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Balancer Web Eye needs image optimization as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 70.8 kB
  • After minification 68.6 kB
  • After compression 58.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 39.3 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Balancer.webeye.hu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Balancer Web Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

balancer.webeye.hu

balancer.webeye.hu

537 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

239 ms

main.css

main.css

346 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

18 ms

jquery.mobile-1.2.0.min.css

jquery.mobile-1.2.0.min.css

5 ms

jquery.selectBoxIt.css

jquery.selectBoxIt.css

15 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

350 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

10 ms

jquery.selectBoxIt.min.js

jquery.selectBoxIt.min.js

3 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

140 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

225 ms

main.js

main.js

235 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

93 ms

site_bg.jpg

site_bg.jpg

149 ms

head_bg.jpg

head_bg.jpg

233 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

298 ms

form_bg.png

form_bg.png

140 ms

right_border.png

right_border.png

140 ms

button_bg.jpg

button_bg.jpg

239 ms

drivingstyle-background.jpg

drivingstyle-background.jpg

357 ms

drivingstyle-truck.png

drivingstyle-truck.png

365 ms

banner-we-logo.png

banner-we-logo.png

255 ms

list-arrow.png

list-arrow.png

355 ms

banner.png

banner.png

696 ms

international.png

international.png

387 ms

choose_your_countrie.png

choose_your_countrie.png

417 ms

flags.png

flags.png

474 ms

calibri.ttf

calibri.ttf

774 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

28 ms

dc.js

dc.js

46 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

14 ms

select_bg.png

select_bg.png

344 ms

hu.jpg

hu.jpg

373 ms

65 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

49 ms

Accessibility Review

balancer.webeye.hu accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

balancer.webeye.hu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

balancer.webeye.hu SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Balancer.webeye.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Balancer.webeye.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

balancer.webeye.hu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Balancer Web Eye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: