3.1 sec in total
327 ms
2.6 sec
194 ms
Click here to check amazing Catalogue We Online content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about catalogue.we-online.com
Passive and Electromechanical Components, Optoelectronics, Power Modules, Automotive, Wireless Connectivity, Custom Magnetics & Connectors, IC Reference Search
Visit catalogue.we-online.comWe analyzed Catalogue.we-online.com page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
catalogue.we-online.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
327 ms
226 ms
347 ms
456 ms
317 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Catalogue.we-online.com, 53% (37 requests) were made to We-online.de and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (844 ms) relates to the external source We-online.de.
Page size can be reduced by 927.3 kB (73%)
1.3 MB
334.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Catalogue.we-online.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 566.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 282.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Catalogue We Online needs image optimization as it can save up to 282.6 kB or 78% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 363.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Catalogue.we-online.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (72%)
65
18
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Catalogue We Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
catalogue.we-online.com
327 ms
226 ms
layout_vertical_listnav.css
347 ms
shariffcomplete.css
456 ms
main.css
317 ms
main_head.js
210 ms
yaml-focusfix.js
352 ms
jquery-144min.js
684 ms
jqueryeasing-13pack.js
352 ms
jquerymousewheel-304pack.js
352 ms
jqueryfancybox-134pack.js
534 ms
jquerycookie.js
438 ms
jqueryjson-23.js
438 ms
we-gallery.js
444 ms
we-navigationoverlay.js
535 ms
we-languageoverlay.js
535 ms
shariff_ie_patch_js.js
540 ms
shariffcomplete~1.js
844 ms
main.js
557 ms
conversion.js
14 ms
base.css
293 ms
nav_shinybuttons.css
295 ms
nav_vlist.css
295 ms
basemod.css
300 ms
content.css
390 ms
jqueryfancybox-134.css
390 ms
jqueryjscrollpane.css
391 ms
we.css
599 ms
print_003_draft.css
436 ms
we_print_css.css
484 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
cateisos_135.jpg
223 ms
bg_grey.png
162 ms
search-submit.png
162 ms
Dropdown_PBS_res06.png
162 ms
Dropdown_PBA_res06.jpg
201 ms
Startseite_PBCM_res06.jpg
161 ms
cateipal_135.jpg
320 ms
catpm_135.jpg
218 ms
cateican_135.jpg
413 ms
caticref_135.jpg
419 ms
gtm.js
89 ms
arrow-down.png
151 ms
lang-en.png
206 ms
more-than-you-expect.jpg
203 ms
nav-overlay-bg.jpg
202 ms
logo.jpg
204 ms
nav-bg.jpg
206 ms
nav-divider.jpg
284 ms
subnav-order-1.jpg
300 ms
breadcrumb-right.png
503 ms
breadcrumbs-home.png
420 ms
breadcrumb-mid.png
512 ms
breadcrumb-left.png
616 ms
bg-accordion-head.png
615 ms
bg-accordion-body.png
527 ms
bg-category-banner.png
527 ms
255537.js
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
98 ms
95 ms
linkid.js
44 ms
wea.js
429 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
57 ms
31 ms
44 ms
collect
136 ms
a.js
421 ms
__ptq.gif
20 ms
collect
116 ms
catalogue.we-online.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
catalogue.we-online.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
catalogue.we-online.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Catalogue.we-online.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Catalogue.we-online.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
catalogue.we-online.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Catalogue We Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: