Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

controversy.wearscience.com

Teach the Controversy brand t-shirts: Intelligently designed pro-evolution, anti-nonsense shirts

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

158 ms

Resources Loaded

723 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

controversy.wearscience.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Controversy Wearscience content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about controversy.wearscience.com

Pro-Science parody T-shirts sarcasically uging schools to teach both sides of all sorts of psudoscience nonsense and mythology. Create your own!

Visit controversy.wearscience.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Controversy.wearscience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 158 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

controversy.wearscience.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

controversy.wearscience.com

158 ms

156 ms

store.js

56 ms

css

42 ms

js

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Controversy.wearscience.com, 95% (57 requests) were made to Amorphia-apparel.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (286 ms) relates to the external source Amorphia-apparel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

509.4 kB

After Optimization

395.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Controversy.wearscience.com main page is 509.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 409.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 82.0 kB

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 99.9 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 409.4 kB
  • After minification 377.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Controversy Wearscience images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

57

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Controversy Wearscience. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

controversy.wearscience.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

controversy.wearscience.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

controversy.wearscience.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Controversy.wearscience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Controversy.wearscience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Controversy Wearscience. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: