3.2 sec in total
11 ms
1.7 sec
1.5 sec
Visit fesatyf.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Fesatyf Word Press content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fesatyf.wordpress.com
Smile! You’re at the best WordPress.com site ever
Visit fesatyf.wordpress.comWe analyzed Fesatyf.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
fesatyf.wordpress.com performance score
11 ms
229 ms
130 ms
163 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Fesatyf.wordpress.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (807 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 768.3 kB (41%)
1.9 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Fesatyf.wordpress.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 820.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fesatyf Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 510.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 510.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fesatyf.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (51%)
45
22
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fesatyf Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fesatyf.wordpress.com
11 ms
fesatyf.wordpress.com
229 ms
130 ms
css
163 ms
163 ms
149 ms
162 ms
style.css
147 ms
gprofiles.js
290 ms
wpgroho.js
146 ms
146 ms
146 ms
tiled-gallery.css
159 ms
274 ms
widgets.js
276 ms
274 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
381 ms
w.js
274 ms
merriweather.css
46 ms
-nWg8Y9oNvE
511 ms
7453253418_7c64b371fc_z.jpg
520 ms
6mWi5EorzVA
609 ms
8015166283_09f40b6825_z.jpg
807 ms
VGuZx0mGe-s
801 ms
D-l-h-g3FQA
800 ms
x4EIyzd6psw
797 ms
7411577838_889908cba5_z.jpg
805 ms
KA4GiTDCCNw
795 ms
AVgpbEvQHLQ
794 ms
circle.png
138 ms
search-icon.png
139 ms
7413370642_349105b66a_z.jpg
534 ms
7392503810_1f056fd19c_z.jpg
791 ms
7399771998_6f693e425f_z.jpg
610 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
402 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
491 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
541 ms
JGVZEP92dXgoQBG1CnQcfKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
509 ms
x-sAbYHwdJCKPJ06aP6Wqw.ttf
550 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6I48KljrVa8Zcyi9xGGohEU.ttf
500 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf
500 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KQ4IK8jcFikBX2R8jKe4LU.ttf
542 ms
Genericons.svg
227 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
31 ms
354 ms
hovercard.css
258 ms
services.css
302 ms
Noticons.svg
121 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
78 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
182 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
212 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
211 ms
g.gif
303 ms
g.gif
229 ms
g.gif
236 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
126 ms
www-embed-player.js
183 ms
base.js
308 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
198 ms
ad_status.js
196 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
18 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
fesatyf.wordpress.com SEO score
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fesatyf.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Fesatyf.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fesatyf.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fesatyf Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: