1.4 sec in total
Click here to check amazing History Web Eye content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about history.webeye.eu
We help our customers to organize their logistics processes more efficiently, cut operational costs and manage their workforce more economically.Visit history.webeye.eu
We analyzed History.webeye.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 763 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
history.webeye.eu performance score
Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to History.webeye.eu and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain History.webeye.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 10 B (9%)
In fact, the total size of History.webeye.eu main page is 112 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 112 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. This web page is already compressed.
We found no issues to fix!
history.webeye.eu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
history.webeye.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Page has valid source maps
history.webeye.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise History.webeye.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that History.webeye.eu main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of History Web Eye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: