Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com

WebsiteRecord - IP Address, Whois & IP Tracing

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

742 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to renoseo.de.websiterecord.com homepage info - get ready to check Renoseo De Website Record best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about renoseo.de.websiterecord.com

renoseo.de web stats and analytics, site safety, seo score is: 28, last updated on 2014-03-17

Visit renoseo.de.websiterecord.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com page load time and found that the first response time was 742 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

renoseo.de

742 ms

style.css

35 ms

responsive.css

35 ms

css

46 ms

respond.min.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com, 9% (10 requests) were made to Google.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Qsearch.media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source T1.extreme-dm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 703.7 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

498.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 801.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 37.7 kB

  • Original 48.9 kB
  • After minification 48.7 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 175.8 kB

  • Original 335.9 kB
  • After minification 160.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Renoseo De Website Record needs image optimization as it can save up to 175.8 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 478.1 kB

  • Original 801.1 kB
  • After minification 799.5 kB
  • After compression 323.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 478.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (64%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Renoseo De Website Record. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

renoseo.de.websiterecord.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Renoseo.de.websiterecord.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Renoseo De Website Record. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: