Tools & Wizards About Us
studioaye.web.app screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

studioaye.web.app

microsoft sql server management studio express (64-bit) - studioaye.web.app

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

5.3 sec

studioaye.web.app screenshot

About Website

Visit studioaye.web.app now to see the best up-to-date Studio Aye Web content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studioaye.web.app

[RANDLINE-(D:/snippets/download/mix/softonik-en/microsoft sql server management studio express (64-bit).txt)]

Visit studioaye.web.app

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioaye.web.app page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioaye.web.app performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioaye.web.app

206 ms

bootstrap.min.css

118 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

149 ms

magnific-popup.css

153 ms

font-awesome.min.css

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Studioaye.web.app, 21% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

894.6 kB

After Optimization

741.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Studioaye.web.app main page is 894.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 811.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 83.2 kB
  • After minification 83.1 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 91.5 kB

  • Original 811.5 kB
  • After minification 719.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Studio Aye Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (85%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Aye Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studioaye.web.app

studioaye.web.app

206 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

118 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

149 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

153 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

174 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

192 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

186 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

184 ms

animate.css

animate.css

155 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

184 ms

style.css

style.css

244 ms

logo.png

logo.png

185 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

170 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

177 ms

contact.js

contact.js

170 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

172 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

187 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

172 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

175 ms

ajax-form.js

ajax-form.js

179 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

176 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

177 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

178 ms

scrollIt.js

scrollIt.js

181 ms

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

jquery.scrollUp.min.js

181 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

181 ms

nice-select.min.js

nice-select.min.js

180 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

181 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

182 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

213 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

255 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

212 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

182 ms

mail-script.js

mail-script.js

237 ms

main.js

main.js

183 ms

author.png

author.png

195 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

176 ms

css

css

45 ms

css

css

58 ms

breadcam_bg.png

breadcam_bg.png

242 ms

dlyy611

dlyy611

241 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

242 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

244 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

423 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

427 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

92 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

424 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

427 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

427 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

426 ms

wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfbwhW.ttf

wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfbwhW.ttf

426 ms

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJXsCxGDNNV.ttf

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJXsCxGDNNV.ttf

513 ms

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GDNNV.ttf

wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GDNNV.ttf

513 ms

Accessibility Review

studioaye.web.app accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

studioaye.web.app best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studioaye.web.app SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioaye.web.app can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Studioaye.web.app main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studioaye.web.app

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio Aye Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: