Tools & Wizards About Us
w.tools screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

w.tools

Web Support Revolution WSR - CDN, Firewall, Backups, Antivirus, SSL, Monitoring

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

596 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

466 ms

w.tools screenshot

About Website

Welcome to w.tools homepage info - get ready to check W best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about w.tools

WSR - improve your SEO & conversion! Perfect website speed, 100% uptime and virus protection. CDN + Firewall + SSL + Backup + Antivirus + Monitoring.

Visit w.tools

Key Findings

We analyzed W.tools page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

w.tools performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

w.tools

596 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

9b983fda-1502283429.css

248 ms

override.css

215 ms

7be3099f-1502283429.css

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original W.tools, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Live.w.tools. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain W.tools.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 986.7 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

882.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of W.tools main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 634.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 115.1 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 633.8 kB
  • After minification 630.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 342.2 kB

  • Original 485.7 kB
  • After minification 422.0 kB
  • After compression 143.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 542.9 kB

  • Original 634.2 kB
  • After minification 576.8 kB
  • After compression 91.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W.tools needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 542.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (42%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

w.tools

w.tools

596 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

170 ms

9b983fda-1502283429.css

9b983fda-1502283429.css

248 ms

override.css

override.css

215 ms

7be3099f-1502283429.css

7be3099f-1502283429.css

183 ms

28093899-1502368583.js

28093899-1502368583.js

298 ms

c6121265-1502283428.js

c6121265-1502283428.js

176 ms

css

css

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

128 ms

watch.js

watch.js

126 ms

internet%20connection%20speed%20test.png

internet%20connection%20speed%20test.png

461 ms

genbutton.php

genbutton.php

268 ms

cloud.png

cloud.png

74 ms

main_animation_sprite.png

main_animation_sprite.png

74 ms

main_animation_arrows_sprite.png

main_animation_arrows_sprite.png

256 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

73 ms

icon-TP.jpg

icon-TP.jpg

72 ms

en_US.png

en_US.png

73 ms

ru_RU.png

ru_RU.png

255 ms

logo.png

logo.png

254 ms

back_1.jpg

back_1.jpg

265 ms

green_arrow.png

green_arrow.png

254 ms

3-1.jpg

3-1.jpg

265 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

266 ms

5555-1.jpg

5555-1.jpg

265 ms

4-1.jpg

4-1.jpg

265 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

265 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

330 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

330 ms

22323333-1.jpg

22323333-1.jpg

330 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

329 ms

454545-1.jpg

454545-1.jpg

329 ms

arr_new.png

arr_new.png

329 ms

arr_big_new.png

arr_big_new.png

364 ms

map.jpg

map.jpg

362 ms

mark-blue.png

mark-blue.png

364 ms

pls.png

pls.png

362 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

362 ms

ec77639afae9126_530x320.jpg

ec77639afae9126_530x320.jpg

364 ms

6b902bb94de0dde_530x320.jpg

6b902bb94de0dde_530x320.jpg

398 ms

d6097dbf55446b7_530x320.jpg

d6097dbf55446b7_530x320.jpg

398 ms

back_3.jpg

back_3.jpg

399 ms

backup_sprite.png

backup_sprite.png

398 ms

back_4.jpg

back_4.jpg

399 ms

RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5USZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5USZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

209 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXdckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

234 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSndckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSndckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

259 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hndckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hndckgy16U_L-eNUgMz0EAk.ttf

259 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

361 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk3zLKZ99nDzxe08CEIyEW0.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk3zLKZ99nDzxe08CEIyEW0.ttf

260 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBnEh7F1Z_3lydansdLiaPMg.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBnEh7F1Z_3lydansdLiaPMg.ttf

259 ms

icon-TP-2.png

icon-TP-2.png

371 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

177 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

177 ms

server.php

server.php

537 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

204 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

collect

collect

89 ms

89 ms

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woffv=4.3.0

fontawesome-webfont.woffv=4.3.0

704 ms

internet%20connection%20speed%20test.png

internet%20connection%20speed%20test.png

393 ms

resource.php

resource.php

106 ms

resource.php

resource.php

131 ms

server.php

server.php

140 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

1021 ms

Accessibility Review

w.tools accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

w.tools best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

w.tools SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W.tools can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that W.tools main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

w.tools

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of W. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: